AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Data platform › Data observability › Soda vs Bigeye
Data quality and observability · October 2026 Edition

Soda vs Bigeye

One of fourteen models named Soda first on the direct prompt; one named Bigeye. Both were named by all fourteen models and Soda carries 42 labels and Bigeye 35, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Soda

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Bigeye

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share9%3%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate7%23%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#4A position in a field of 9; printed, not drawn.
Labels4235A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Soda reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Metaplane was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. Metaplane vs Soda · Metaplane vs Bigeye · Soda vs Monte Carlo

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the data quality and observability page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
SodaFirst choices, of fourteen modelsBigeye
Direct11
Paraphrase30
Comparative01
Budget-constrained203 against Bigeye
Scale-constrained01
Negative003 against Soda · 5 against Bigeye
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Soda and Bigeye were named in the same answer sixty times, of the 106 answers naming Soda and the 105 naming Bigeye. In those answers Bigeye took the first choice four times and Soda eight.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Soda and Bigeye stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Soda Bigeye first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Soda on the left and Bigeye on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Soda and Bigeye stood in it.

Soda first, Bigeye an alternative

1 of 14 modelsBigeye was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GPT-5.4 miniMonte Carlo, Soda alternatives: Acceldata, Bigeye

Bigeye first, Soda not the choice

1 of 14 modelsSoda was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Muse Glimmer 30BBigeye, Metaplane

Neither was the first choice, one was named

9 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Monte Carlo alternatives: Bigeye, New Relic
Gemini 3.5 FlashMetaplane alternatives: Elementary, Soda
Perplexity SonarMetaplane alternatives: Bigeye
DeepSeek V4 FlashMetaplane alternatives: Soda
Qwen 3.7 FlashMetaplane alternatives: Great Expectations, Soda
Kimi K2Metaplane alternatives: Bigeye, Soda
GLM 4.7 FlashXMetaplane alternatives: Anomalo, Bigeye, Monte Carlo
MiniMax M2.5Metaplane alternatives: Bigeye, Monte Carlo
GPT-6 LunaMetaplane alternatives: Monte Carlo, Soda

Neither was named

3 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Grok 4.1 FastMetaplane alternatives: Monte Carlo
Mistral SmallMetaplane
Llama 4 MaverickMetaplane, New Relic

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Soda leads by seven points.
Soda9%#2 of 11
Bigeye1%#9 of 11
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Soda leads by six points.
Soda9%#2 of 9
Bigeye3%#4 of 9
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Soda leads by four points.
Soda4%#5 of 12
Bigeye0%#11 of 12
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Soda

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“Why be cautious: if you plan to stay on Soda Core open-source, assess ongoing support and feature parity; Soda Cloud pricing and roadmap are not self-serve” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“License change risk... Not full observability... Limited out-of-the-box metrics.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Soda might require more upfront effort to configure tests” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Soda is often the better default because mid-sized teams usually benefit from faster adoption and built-in observability” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd shortlist Soda. It offers checks and monitoring across common warehouses and databases” GPT-6 Luna · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“best value choice is usually Great Expectations (GX Core) or Soda Free/open-source first” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Bigeye

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Why be cautious: integration gaps for non-standard stacks, workspace management overhead, and enterprise-only quote pricing.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“users note tuning needs; consolidation (e.g., via acquisitions like Datadog/Metaplane) may disrupt roadmaps” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“Monte Carlo, Anomalo, Bigeye: While popular, these ML-based platforms are best for specific use cases” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“Bigeye is positioned as the Enterprise AI Trust Platform combining data observability, end-to-end lineage and agentic AI governance. It is recommended for large enterprises 500+ employees” Muse Glimmer 30B · scale prompt · first choice
“Bigeye is the platform most guides explicitly call out for mid-market ease of use and quick implementation” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · first choice
“If you want production observability with automated anomaly detection: Monte Carlo or Bigeye” GPT-5.4 mini · comparative prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.