Every category where a model named Black Duck Coverity for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Static application security testing	Developer platform	0%	17 of 47	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Semgrep at 47%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Black Duck Coverity yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Black Duck Coverity across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative14 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative7 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative26 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Coverity and Fortify are legacy heavyweights” GLM 4.7 FlashX · SAST · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best for C/C++: Coverity” GPT-5.4 mini · SAST · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Black Duck Coverity, over the 26 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Black Duck Coverity was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Checkmarx One26 of 2612Not in the top three

Semgrep24 of 266Not in the top three

SonarQube24 of 260Not in the top three

Snyk Code22 of 263Not in the top three

OpenText Fortify22 of 260Not in the top three

Veracode17 of 262Not in the top three

CodeQL11 of 260Not in the top three

HCL AppScan8 of 261Not in the top three

Veracode Static Analysis7 of 262Not in the top three

Aikido Security7 of 260Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Black Duck Coverity. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 24 of the 26 answers that named Black Duck Coverity and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

appsecsanta.com18

augmentcode.com17

zeropath.com16

corgea.com15

aikido.dev12

pixee.ai12

checkmarx.com10

cycode.com10

dev.to9

endorlabs.com8

127 of the 127 domain citations in answers naming Black Duck Coverity came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

zeropath.com/blog/best-sast-tools16

augmentcode.com/tools/enterprise-sast-tools-large-teams-field-guide14

appsecsanta.com/sast-tools/enterprise-sast-tools13

corgea.com/learn/best-sast-tools13

aikido.dev/blog/top-enterprise-sast-tools10

cycode.com/blog/top-13-enterprise-sast-tools-for-20269

dev.to/rahulxsingh/i-reviewed-32-sast-tools-the-ones-worth-using-283e9

pixee.ai/blog/best-sast-tools-20269

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Black Duck Coverity

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Black Duck Coverity; a claim can dispute any of them.

Coverity 1Synopsys Coverity 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Black Duck Coverity's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Black Duck Coverity, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at blackduck.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.