Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 41 → 46 of 47
1 category · RankedVeracode Static Analysis
138Judge labels
7First choices
56Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
13% in SAST for enterprise buyers
Rank 7 of 71 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 28% of its 39 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Veracode Static Analysis →By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
Small business50 of 51
0%35 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market7 of 71
2%39 labels
criticized challenger
Enterprise2 of 45
13%64 labels
accepted challenger
In sast · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Veracode Static Analysis for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Static application security testing | Developer platform | 2% | 7 of 71 | 28% | 39 | criticized challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Veracode Static Analysis held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · SAST · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 8 → 7 of 65
Enterprise▲+1Since September 2026: 15% → 15%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
15%from 15% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 2 of 42, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAST | 2% | 2% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 8 → 7 of 71 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Veracode Static Analysis across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Veracode Static Analysis across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct24 labels3
Paraphrase26 labels3
Comparative31 labelsNone
Budget-constrained11 labels1
Scale-constrained16 labelsNone
Negative30 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative138 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“the recommended static code security scanner for a mid-sized B2B company could be either Checkmarx or Veracode” Llama 4 Maverick · SAST · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Excels in broad language/framework support (including legacy/binary), whole-app analysis, and enterprise integrations” Grok 4.20 · SAST · comparative prompt · alternative
“Highly regulated environments, on-premises requirements, or teams needing very deep taint analysis.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · SAST · direct prompt · alternative
“Choose Veracode, Checkmarx, or Black Duck if you are a large, highly regulated enterprise” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SAST · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“What I'd Avoid for Mid-Market: Checkmarx and Veracode are powerful but typically start at $60K–$100K+/year” Kimi K2 · SAST · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Full scans can delay fast-moving dev cycles, there's no on-premise option with code upload raising security concerns, and pricing can be steep” Claude Haiku 4.5 · SAST · negative prompt · soft negative
“not necessarily the one with the most heavy-duty enterprise compliance rules (like legacy tools Veracode or Fortify)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SAST · direct prompt · soft negative
“Tools like Fortify (Micro Focus), Checkmarx, and Veracode ... have steep learning curves” Qwen 3.7 Flash · SAST · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Veracode Static Analysis, over the 138 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Veracode Static Analysis was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Veracode Static Analysis, over the 138 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Veracode Static Analysis was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Veracode Static Analysis. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 125 of the 138 answers that named Veracode Static Analysis and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
checkmarx.com90
dev.to79
aikido.dev60
appsecsanta.com58
augmentcode.com53
zeropath.com43
codeant.ai40
safeguard.sh40
corgea.com37
opsera.ai34
534 of the 534 domain citations in answers naming Veracode Static Analysis came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
veracode.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Veracode Static Analysis takes 2% of first choices and Semgrep takes 36%.ShowHide
Search and answers
veracode.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Veracode Static Analysis takes 2% of first choices and Semgrep takes 36%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “sast tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “sast tools”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 40 a month (“veracode static analysis”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 2 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 12,543 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 3,691 · 181 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 9,588
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 7 of 71 in SAST
Segment leader
36%
Semgrep
- First choices
- 7 across its categories
- Named in
- 138 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 125 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on veracode.com
1,969
subdomains included
Content
668
counted in the table below
Documentation
882
Product · Integration
25 · 7
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 464 | 16 | 2026-09-23 | SAST, SCA | |
| Report or ebook | 66 | 6 | 2026-09-08 | SAST, SCA | |
| Conference or event | 55 | 1 | 2026-08-04 | ||
| Case study | 29 | 1 | 2026-09-08 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 28 | 1 | 2026-08-11 | SAST | |
| Glossary or explainer | 11 | 0 | 2025-12-29 | SCA, SAST | |
| Comparison | 10 | 1 | 2026-08-18 | SCA, SAST | |
| Podcast or video | 2 | 0 | 2024-11-04 | ||
| News or press | 2 | 0 | 2024-10-25 | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-23Application risk intelligence september 23 blog
- 2026-09-22Application security software for business growth blog
- 2026-09-17Application risk intelligence september 17 blog
- 2026-09-17Mature software supply chain security program blog
- 2026-09-14Eu cyber resilience act 2026 compliance blog
- 2026-09-10Devsecops application security platform blog
Events in person
Last twelve months
- March 24, 2026Networking Breakfast at RSA 2026: Securing Your Software Supply ChainHYATT REGENCY SAN FRANCISCO, San Francisco, USA · hosted
As the event pages on veracode.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page veracode.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Veracode Static Analysis
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Veracode Static Analysis; a claim can dispute any of them.
Veracode 32
Follow Veracode Static Analysis
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Veracode Static Analysis is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Veracode Static Analysis is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Perform functions related to Pipeline Scan.
- For
- development teams
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What Veracode Static Analysis's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: docs.veracode.com/r/veracode_static, docs.veracode.com/r/c_static_overview, docs.veracode.com/r/veracode_static_scan, docs.veracode.com/r/Veracode_Fix_for_SAST, docs.veracode.com/r/c_using_static_overview. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Veracode Static Analysis's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Veracode Static Analysis, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Veracode Static Analysis by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Veracode Static Analysis is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Veracode Static Analysis, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.