Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 13 → 5 of 42
SentinelOne · 2 categories · RankedSentinelOne Singularity MDR
56Judge labels
1First choices
6Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in MDR for small business buyers
Rank 12 of 67 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 9% of its 22 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of SentinelOne Singularity MDR →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business6 of 48
2%15 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market12 of 67
0%22 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise17 of 67
0%18 labels
accepted challenger
In mdr · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named SentinelOne Singularity MDR for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Managed detection and response | Security operations | 0% | 12 of 67 | 9% | 22 | accepted challenger | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Endpoint detection and response | Security operations | 0% | 22 of 55 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Defender for Endpoint at 30% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, SentinelOne Singularity MDR held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · MDR · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 7 → 12 of 65
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 15 → 16 of 60
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDR | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 7 → 12 of 67 |
| EDR | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 25 → 22 of 55 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated SentinelOne Singularity MDR across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated SentinelOne Singularity MDR across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct6 labels1
Paraphrase11 labelsNone
Comparative18 labelsNone
Budget-constrained9 labelsNone
Scale-constrained6 labelsNone
Negative6 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative56 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“known for its speed of containment and is highly favored by organizations looking to combine automated isolation with expert human oversight” Gemini 3.5 Flash · MDR · comparative prompt · alternative
“providers like Expel, eSentire, Rapid7, CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, Arctic Wolf, and Critical Start (these are well-regarded)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · MDR · negative prompt · alternative
“Best autonomous response & rollback; great for lean teams | Slightly less intuitive for non-security users” DeepSeek V4 Flash · EDR · scale prompt · alternative
“Best fit: Mid-Market to Enterprise already using SentinelOne EDR/XDR and wanting AI-powered response.” Muse Glimmer 30B · MDR · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“What to Avoid on a Tight Budget ... Requires you to already own SentinelOne EDR” Kimi K2 · MDR · budget prompt · hard negative
“are powerful but priced $25–$45+/endpoint/month — likely overkill for a tight budget” DeepSeek V4 Flash · MDR · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SentinelOne Singularity MDR, over the 56 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SentinelOne Singularity MDR was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SentinelOne Singularity MDR, over the 56 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SentinelOne Singularity MDR was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SentinelOne Singularity MDR. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 50 of the 56 answers that named SentinelOne Singularity MDR and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
huntress.com27
kaseya.com24
mdrproviders.io23
intezer.com21
cynet.com19
gbhackers.com18
rapid7.com17
expertinsights.com15
paloaltonetworks.com15
sentinelone.comYour site15
179 of the 194 domain citations in answers naming SentinelOne Singularity MDR came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where SentinelOne Singularity MDR stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where SentinelOne Singularity MDR stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 10 a month (“sentinelone singularity mdr”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Its own site
- It sits on SentinelOne's site (sentinelone.com), so there are no site figures for it alone
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 12 of 67 in MDR
Segment leader
37%
Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 56 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 50 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as SentinelOne Singularity MDR
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SentinelOne Singularity MDR; a claim can dispute any of them.
SentinelOne 13SentinelOne Vigilance 6SentinelOne MDR 1SentinelOne Vigilance (Wayfinder) 1SentinelOne Vigilance / Singularity Complete 1SentinelOne Vigilance / Wayfinder MDR 1
Follow SentinelOne Singularity MDR
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
SentinelOne is the company behind SentinelOne Singularity MDR.ShowHide
The company
SentinelOne is the company behind SentinelOne Singularity MDR.
ShowHideOn record
Company recordsIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- 24/7 Expert Defense. Machine-Speed Response.
- Certifications
- Certified analysts
- Customers named
- Barry-WehmillerSundt ConstructionFIMBankAllcargo Logistics
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting
What SentinelOne Singularity MDR's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: sentinelone.com/global-services/managed-detection-and-response, university.sentinelone.com/courses/sentinelone-singularity-platform-with-michael-leland, university.sentinelone.com/courses/understanding-singularity-cloud-security-with-sentinelone, sentinelone.com/resources/datasheets/singularity-xdr, sentinelone.com/cybersecurity-101/services/mdr-benefits. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SentinelOne Singularity MDR's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SentinelOne Singularity MDR, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SentinelOne Singularity MDR by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where SentinelOne Singularity MDR is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name SentinelOne Singularity MDR, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.