AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › SentinelOne Prompt Security · October 2026 Edition
SentinelOne · 1 category · Named, not ranked

SentinelOne Prompt Security

3Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
3 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. SentinelOne Prompt Security was named 1 time in AI security, where SentinelOne Singularity led with 11%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In ai security · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named SentinelOne Prompt Security for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
AI security platformsSecurity operations0%134 of 2330%1under 10 labels · led by SentinelOne Singularity at 11%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SentinelOne Prompt Security yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SentinelOne Prompt Security across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna01001
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Also compare: SentinelOne Prompt Security if you already use SentinelOne” GPT-6 Luna · AI security · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SentinelOne Prompt Security, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SentinelOne Prompt Security was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Check Point AI Security1 of 31Not among the top eight
Microsoft 365 Copilot with Purview1 of 31Not among the top eight
Palo Alto Networks Prisma AIRS1 of 31Not among the top eight
Anthropic Claude Enterprise1 of 30Not among the top eight
Check Point — Lakera Guard1 of 30Not among the top eight
Cisco — Secure AI / Robust Intelligence1 of 30Not among the top eight
Cyberhaven1 of 30Not among the top eight
F5 — CalypsoAI1 of 30Not among the top eight
Google Gemini1 of 30Not among the top eight
HiddenLayer1 of 30Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SentinelOne Prompt Security. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 3 answers that named SentinelOne Prompt Security and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

checkpoint.com2
sentinelone.comYour site2
aicostadvisory.com1
aikido.dev1
aioutlooks.com1
checkmarx.com1
cloud.google.com1
csoonline.com1
cyberhaven.com1
cybermagazine.com1

Ten of the twelve domain citations in answers naming SentinelOne Prompt Security came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow SentinelOne Prompt Security

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

SentinelOne is the company behind SentinelOne Prompt Security.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
An AI security platform that protects how employees, developers, and applications use AI across the enterprise, with real-time governance, data leakage prevention, and threat protection.
For
employees, developers, and applications
Customers named
10x BankingCarnival CorporationCymulate
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting

What SentinelOne Prompt Security's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: sentinelone.com/platform/securing-ai-prompt, university.sentinelone.com/pages/prompt-security, sentinelone.com/platform/prompt-security-ai-usage-control, sentinelone.com/platform/prompt-security-agentic-ai-security, sentinelone.com/platform/prompt-security-ai-application-security. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SentinelOne Prompt Security's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SentinelOne Prompt Security, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SentinelOne Prompt Security by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where SentinelOne Prompt Security is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name SentinelOne Prompt Security, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sentinelone.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.