IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › SecureAuth · September 2026 Edition

3 categories · Named, not ranked

SecureAuth

7Judge labels

0First choices

2Negative labels

3 of 12Models named it

3Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. SecureAuth was named 4 times in CIAM and 2 other categories, where Auth0 led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business28 of 52

under the label threshold

Mid-market26 of 74

under the label threshold

Enterprise49 of 60

under the label threshold

In ciam · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named SecureAuth for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Customer identity and access management	Identity and access	0%	26 of 74	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Auth0 at 22%
Multi-factor authentication	Identity and access	0%	66 of 78	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Cisco Duo at 42%
Workforce identity and SSO	Identity and access	0%	41 of 48	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Entra ID at 36%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SecureAuth yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SecureAuth across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	1	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“SecureAuth is another option that provides a CIAM platform for B2B SaaS companies” Llama 4 Maverick · CIAM · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“it may not offer broader workforce IAM capabilities” Llama 4 Maverick · Workforce identity · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SecureAuth, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SecureAuth was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

LoginRadius4 of 71Not in the top three

Ping Identity4 of 70Not in the top three

Auth03 of 70Not in the top three

Descope3 of 70Not in the top three

Cisco Duo2 of 71Not in the top three

IBM Verify2 of 70Not in the top three

Keycloak2 of 70Not in the top three

Microsoft Entra External ID2 of 70Not in the top three

Okta2 of 70Not in the top three

Amazon Cognito1 of 70Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SecureAuth. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 7 answers that named SecureAuth and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

loginradius.com6

startwithidentity.com5

secureauth.comYour site4

descope.com3

securityboulevard.com3

cpl.thalesgroup.com2

forrester.com2

guptadeepak.com2

ibtimes.com2

siit.io2

Twenty-seven of the thirty-one domain citations in answers naming SecureAuth came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cpl.thalesgroup.com/sites/default/files/content/research_reports_white_papers/field_docume2

descope.com/blog/post/ciam-solutions2

guptadeepak.com/top-5-enterprise-ciam-platforms-in-depth-comparison2

ibtimes.com/top-5-best-customer-identity-access-management-ciam-solutions-2026-38008782

loginradius.com/blog/identity/right-identity-platform-for-growth2

loginradius.com/blog/identity/top-ciam-for-large-enterprises2

loginradius.com/blog/identity/top-ciam-for-small-and-medium-businesses2

secureauth.com/solutions/use-cases/b2b-ciam2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SecureAuth's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SecureAuth, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at secureauth.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.