| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data catalogs and governance | Data platform | 11% | 3 of 83 | 0% | 18 | accepted challenger | |
| Data quality and observability | Data platform | 0% | 87 of 110 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Metaplane at 31% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best low-cost SaaS option: Secoda for small or early-stage teams... Secoda is the strongest SaaS candidate for small teams” Perplexity Sonar · Data catalogs · budget prompt · first choice
“Secoda and Select Star are incredibly fast to stand up (1–2 weeks) and highly intuitive for lean teams.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Data catalogs · scale prompt · first choice
“For most mid-market B2B companies, Secoda is the strongest recommendation” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Data catalogs · direct prompt · first choice
“look toward modern "active metadata" platforms like Atlan, Alation, or Secoda” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Data catalogs · negative prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 83 of the 83 answers that named Secoda and are not a share of its labels.
319 of the 346 domain citations in answers naming Secoda came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glossary or explainer | 1,225 | undated | Data catalogs, ETL | ||
| Blog | 557 | undated | Data catalogs, ETL | ||
| Comparison | 69 | undated | Data catalogs, DLP | ||
| Case study | 37 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 18 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 12 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 4 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 2 | undated | |||
| News or press | 2 | 0 | 2025-11-07 |
Every page secoda.co exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Secoda's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: secoda.co, secoda.co/pricing, trust.secoda.co, secoda.co/customers, secoda.co/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Secoda's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Secoda, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Secoda by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
Secoda is among the products AI models recommend first in Data catalogs and governance this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.