AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › data.world · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

data.world

48Judge labels
2First choices
7Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Data catalogs for enterprise buyers
Rank 11 of 83 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 18 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of data.world →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In data catalogs · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named data.world for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Data catalogs and governanceData platform0%11 of 830%18accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for data.world yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated data.world across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01102
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.1 Fast00303
Mistral Small01102
DeepSeek V4 Flash01102
Llama 4 Maverick01102
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K202002
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.500202
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct9 labels2
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative13 labelsNone
Budget-constrained6 labelsNone
Scale-constrained9 labelsNone
Negative10 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative48 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Other options include Ataccama and data.world, which offer integrated data quality or knowledge-graph approaches without enterprise-tier costs.” Llama 4 Maverick · Data catalogs · budget prompt · alternative
“such as Collibra, Alation, Informatica, Microsoft Purview, Atlan, data.world, Ataccama, and IBM” Mistral Small · Data catalogs · negative prompt · alternative
“The Modern Independents (Your Sweet Spot): Atlan, Secoda, Select Star, OvalEdge, data.world” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Data catalogs · scale prompt · alternative
“Knowledge‑graph‑based discovery, purpose‑built for governance and analytics” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Data catalogs · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as data.world, over the 48 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and data.world was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Collibra42 of 488Not among the top eight
Alation41 of 483Not among the top eight
Atlan39 of 4816Not among the top eight
Microsoft Purview25 of 481Not among the top eight
Secoda23 of 487Not among the top eight
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud23 of 481Not among the top eight
OvalEdge22 of 481Not among the top eight
OpenMetadata18 of 482Not among the top eight
DataHub18 of 481Not among the top eight
Amundsen15 of 481Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named data.world. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 47 of the 48 answers that named data.world and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

atlan.com43
ovaledge.com34
data.worldYour site26
kanerika.com21
decube.io18
basedash.com17
eweek.com17
g2.com14
alation.com13
gartner.com12

189 of the 215 domain citations in answers naming data.world came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

data.world is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, data.world takes 0% of first choices and Atlan takes 44%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “data catalog”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best data catalog”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
880 a month (“data.world”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
5 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 8,626 a month
Searches its site ranks for
4,158 · 113 in the top three
Sites linking to it
15,979
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 11 of 83 in data catalogs
Segment leader
44%
Atlan
First choices
2 across its categories
Named in
48 answers
Its own site cited
in 47 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on data.world
8,383
subdomains included
Content
939
counted in the table below
Documentation
1,242
Product · Integration
41 · 6
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog41802025-07-18Data catalogs
Podcast or video195undatedData catalogs, Master data
Webinar or virtual event95undatedData catalogs
Comparison57undatedData catalogs
News or press52undatedData catalogs, Data virtualization
Conference or event4602025-06-20
Glossary or explainer29undatedData catalogs
Report or ebook25undatedData catalogs
Case study14undated
Template or tool8undatedData catalogs

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page data.world exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as data.world

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as data.world; a claim can dispute any of them.
Data.world 3Data.World 1

Follow data.world

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

data.world is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
The Data Catalog Platform
For
the enterprise data catalog data teams trust in the AI era
Certifications
SOC 2 Type IIHIPAA
Customers named
Penguin Random House UK
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting

What data.world's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: data.world, data.world/legal/security, data.world/product, data.world/customers, data.world/product/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when data.world's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as data.world, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for data.world by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where data.world is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name data.world, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at data.world is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.