| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data catalogs and governance | Data platform | 7% | 5 of 83 | 14% | 36 | accepted challenger | |
| Data quality and observability | Data platform | 0% | 68 of 110 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Metaplane at 31% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“likely to be an open-source tool such as Amundsen or DataHub, which are suitable for on-premise environments” Llama 4 Maverick · Data catalogs · budget prompt · first choice
“If you have some technical resources, OpenMetadata or DataHub are the best free options.” Mistral Small · Data catalogs · budget prompt · first choice
“Best overall low-budget choice: DataHub” GPT-5.4 mini · Data catalogs · budget prompt · first choice
“the best default choice is usually DataHub” GPT-5.4 mini · Data catalogs · direct prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid for Mid-Market: ... open-source like DataHub/Amundsen (free but needs engineering overhead)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Data catalogs · direct prompt · hard negative
“Only choose this if you have a dedicated data platform engineer who has the bandwidth to manage and upgrade the infrastructure.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Data catalogs · scale prompt · soft negative
“While open source options like OpenMetadata and DataHub are credible, they require substantial in-house engineering expertise” Mistral Small · Data catalogs · negative prompt · soft negative
“Tools like DataHub or Amundsen (open source) have lower license costs but require significant DevOps effort” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Data catalogs · scale prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 93 of the 101 answers that named DataHub and are not a share of its labels.
366 of the 366 domain citations in answers naming DataHub came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 209 | undated | Data catalogs | ||
| Case study | 28 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 28 | 0 | 2024-06-03 | ETL, Data catalogs | |
| Report or ebook | 17 | undated | Data catalogs | ||
| Comparison | 17 | undated | Data catalogs | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 13 | undated | Data catalogs | ||
| Conference or event | 11 | undated | Data catalogs | ||
| News or press | 10 | undated |
As the event pages on datahub.com state them, read October 5, 2026.
Every page datahub.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What DataHub's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: datahub.com, trust.datahub.com, datahub.com/products/data-lineage, datahub.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when DataHub's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as DataHub, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for DataHub by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: