AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › DataHub · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

DataHub

101Judge labels
7First choices
22Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
7% in Data catalogs for mid-market buyers
Rank 5 of 83 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 14% of its 36 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of DataHub →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In data catalogs · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named DataHub for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Data catalogs and governanceData platform7%5 of 8314%36accepted challenger
Data quality and observabilityData platform0%68 of 1100%1under 10 labels · led by Metaplane at 31%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for DataHub yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated DataHub across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini20002
Gemini 3.5 Flash01012
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01113
Mistral Small10113
DeepSeek V4 Flash04004
Llama 4 Maverick10203
Qwen 3.7 Flash02125
Kimi K202204
GLM 4.7 FlashX00404
MiniMax M2.501102
GPT-6 Luna02002
Muse Glimmer 30B02103

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct16 labels2
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative21 labelsNone
Budget-constrained29 labels5
Scale-constrained14 labelsNone
Negative20 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative101 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 8 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“likely to be an open-source tool such as Amundsen or DataHub, which are suitable for on-premise environments” Llama 4 Maverick · Data catalogs · budget prompt · first choice
“If you have some technical resources, OpenMetadata or DataHub are the best free options.” Mistral Small · Data catalogs · budget prompt · first choice
“Best overall low-budget choice: DataHub” GPT-5.4 mini · Data catalogs · budget prompt · first choice
“the best default choice is usually DataHub” GPT-5.4 mini · Data catalogs · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid for Mid-Market: ... open-source like DataHub/Amundsen (free but needs engineering overhead)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Data catalogs · direct prompt · hard negative
“Only choose this if you have a dedicated data platform engineer who has the bandwidth to manage and upgrade the infrastructure.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Data catalogs · scale prompt · soft negative
“While open source options like OpenMetadata and DataHub are credible, they require substantial in-house engineering expertise” Mistral Small · Data catalogs · negative prompt · soft negative
“Tools like DataHub or Amundsen (open source) have lower license costs but require significant DevOps effort” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Data catalogs · scale prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as DataHub, over the 101 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and DataHub was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Collibra81 of 10112Not among the top eight
Alation79 of 1018Not among the top eight
Atlan72 of 10128Compare →
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud41 of 1011Not among the top eight
Apache Atlas26 of 1010Not among the top eight
Databricks Unity Catalog25 of 1011Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named DataHub. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 93 of the 101 answers that named DataHub and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

atlan.com83
kanerika.com53
ovaledge.com53
decube.io43
data.world28
erstudio.com27
basedash.com22
fastero.com20
alation.com19
datatrail.ai18

366 of the 366 domain citations in answers naming DataHub came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

datahub.com ranks 8 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, DataHub takes 7% of first choices and Atlan takes 44%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “data catalog”
8
Position for “best data catalog”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
5,400 a month (“datahub”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
275 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 7,220 a month
Searches its site ranks for
1,531 · 77 in the top three
Sites linking to it
2,109
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
120+ ads · 77 text, 31 image, 12 video · 79 shown in the last 30 days

First shown February 2026, as Acryl Data, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 120 in the year.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
7%
rank 5 of 83 in data catalogs
Segment leader
44%
Atlan
First choices
7 across its categories
Named in
101 answers
Its own site cited
in 93 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on datahub.com
1,087
subdomains included
Content
333
counted in the table below
Documentation
668
Product · Integration
7 · 4
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog209undatedData catalogs
Case study28undated
Glossary or explainer2802024-06-03ETL, Data catalogs
Report or ebook17undatedData catalogs
Comparison17undatedData catalogs
Webinar or virtual event13undatedData catalogs
Conference or event11undatedData catalogs
News or press10undated

Most recent

Events in person

Last twelve months

As the event pages on datahub.com state them, read October 5, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page datahub.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as DataHub

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as DataHub; a claim can dispute any of them.
DataHub (LinkedIn) 2DataHub (Open Source) 1Datahub 1OpenMetadata/DataHub 1

Follow DataHub

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

DataHub is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
AI & data context management platform
For
enterprise data teams around the world; teams building AI agents; practitioners laying the context foundation for their businesses
Price stated
Enterprise pricing. Request a demo for details. datahub.com/products/data-lineage
Integrations claimed
100 datahub.com/products/data-lineage
Certifications
SOC 2 Type II certified infrastructure
Customers named
NetflixTrustpilotPinterestOptumSuper TechnologiesUken GamesChime
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, free plan or trial, hosting

What DataHub's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: datahub.com, trust.datahub.com, datahub.com/products/data-lineage, datahub.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when DataHub's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as DataHub, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for DataHub by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where DataHub is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name DataHub, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at datahub.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.