AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › ScienceLogic AI Platform · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

ScienceLogic AI Platform

4Judge labels
0First choices
3Negative labels
2 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. ScienceLogic AI Platform was named 2 times in AIOps, where New Relic led with 17%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In aiops · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named ScienceLogic AI Platform for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
AIOps platformsIT operations and endpoint0%77 of 9350%2under 10 labels · led by New Relic at 17%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ScienceLogic AI Platform yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ScienceLogic AI Platform across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00112

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Users face challenges with noisy alerts and false positives” Muse Glimmer 30B · AIOps · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ScienceLogic AI Platform, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ScienceLogic AI Platform was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Dynatrace4 of 41Not among the top eight
Atera3 of 42Not among the top eight
Datadog3 of 40Not among the top eight
BigPanda2 of 40Not among the top eight
IBM Instana2 of 40Not among the top eight
Moogsoft2 of 40Not among the top eight
New Relic2 of 40Not among the top eight
ServiceNow IT Operations Management2 of 40Not among the top eight
Freshservice1 of 41Not among the top eight
BMC Helix AIOps1 of 40Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ScienceLogic AI Platform. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named ScienceLogic AI Platform and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com3
learn.g2.com3
motadata.com3
coralogix.com2
guideflow.com2
openobserve.ai2
viewpointanalysis.com2
adventuremedia.ai1
ascendinfotech.com1
axiometica.com1

Twenty of the twenty domain citations in answers naming ScienceLogic AI Platform came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on sciencelogic.com
2,373
subdomains included
Content
1,043
counted in the table below
Documentation
1,074
Product · Integration
48 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog813262026-09-22Infra monitoring, APM
News or press13732026-09-15Observability
Case study2702026-01-06
Comparison2522026-09-03
Conference or event1002025-12-18APM
Webinar or virtual event902026-06-29
Report or ebook802025-07-10
Glossary or explainer802023-03-02
Podcast or video402026-05-04
Template or tool202025-10-06
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page sciencelogic.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow ScienceLogic AI Platform

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ScienceLogic AI Platform's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ScienceLogic AI Platform, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ScienceLogic AI Platform by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where ScienceLogic AI Platform is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name ScienceLogic AI Platform, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sciencelogic.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.