| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIOps platforms | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 78 of 93 | 43% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by New Relic at 17% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“ServiceNow ITOM fits large enterprises that need deeper service visibility, alert correlation and workflow-driven operations.” Muse Glimmer 30B · AIOps · comparative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Powerful if you're already embedded in the ServiceNow ecosystem, but avoid if you need rapid deployment or have limited budget.” Kimi K2 · AIOps · negative prompt · soft negative
“It consistently ranks as having a steep learning curve and significant setup complexity” DeepSeek V4 Flash · AIOps · negative prompt · soft negative
“ServiceNow is widely considered an expensive option with a very steep learning curve.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · AIOps · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 24 of the 24 answers that named ServiceNow IT Operations Management and are not a share of its labels.
125 of the 125 domain citations in answers naming ServiceNow IT Operations Management came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What ServiceNow IT Operations Management's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: careers.servicenow.com/jobs/744000151461304/itom-solution-architect, careers.servicenow.com/jobs/744000147693009/director-product-design-it-service-management, careers.servicenow.com/jobs/744000153032540/sr-manager-product-design-it-asset-management. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ServiceNow IT Operations Management's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ServiceNow IT Operations Management, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ServiceNow IT Operations Management by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: