Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 6 → 8 of 36
1 category · RankedAirbrake
31Judge labels
0First choices
7Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Error monitoring for mid-market buyers
Rank 14 of 42 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 20% of its 10 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Airbrake →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business8 of 36
0%12 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market14 of 42
0%10 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise42 of 48
0%9 labels
under the label threshold
In error monitoring · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Airbrake for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Error and crash monitoring | Developer platform | 0% | 14 of 42 | 20% | 10 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Airbrake held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Error monitoring · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 11 → 15 of 39
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 17 → 46 of 47
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Error monitoring | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 11 → 14 of 42 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Airbrake across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Airbrake across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase7 labelsNone
Comparative12 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative6 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative31 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If they are looking for a simple crash reporting solution, Airbrake or Raygun may be a better fit.” Llama 4 Maverick · Error monitoring · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Known for simplicity, speed, and reliability, especially for web developers and backend teams.” Mistral Small · Error monitoring · comparative prompt · alternative
“Airbrake earns the top spot in the 2026 crash reporting ranking” Muse Glimmer 30B · Error monitoring · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Another strong option is Airbrake” Mistral Small · Error monitoring · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“users note that feature development has dramatically slowed compared to agile startups” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Error monitoring · negative prompt · soft negative
“its feature set feels static compared to Sentry or Rollbar” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Error monitoring · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Airbrake, over the 31 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Airbrake was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Airbrake, over the 31 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Airbrake was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Airbrake. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 31 of the 31 answers that named Airbrake and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
ones.com24
dupple.com23
guideflow.com15
citehawk.com13
zipdo.co13
debugg.ai10
devopsschool.com9
costbench.com8
g2.com8
flatlogic.com7
130 of the 130 domain citations in answers naming Airbrake came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
airbrake.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Airbrake takes 0% of first choices and Sentry takes 76%.ShowHide
Search and answers
airbrake.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Airbrake takes 0% of first choices and Sentry takes 76%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “error monitoring tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “error monitoring tools”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 5,400 a month (“airbrake”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 164 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 10,122 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,722 · 55 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,416
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 14 of 42 in error monitoring
Segment leader
76%
Sentry
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 31 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 31 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on airbrake.io
664
subdomains included
Content
48
counted in the table below
Documentation
606
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case study | 23 | 0 | 2023-01-20 | ||
| Blog | 9 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 7 | 0 | 2021-10-22 | ||
| Report or ebook | 4 | 0 | 2013-09-24 | ||
| Comparison | 2 | 0 | 2021-01-19 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | 0 | 2020-09-28 | ||
| Podcast or video | 1 | 0 | 2016-11-14 | ||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2023-01-20How to leverage iterative testing to build better software case study
- 2022-12-22What is prompt engineering case study
- 2022-12-20Comparing popular web stacks mern mean mevn meng lamp and ruby on rails case study
- 2022-11-21Why ruby on rails works for machine learning development case study
- 2022-11-04A guide for developers searching for their next job case study
- 2022-11-04Building a python api with replit and airbrake case study
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page airbrake.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Airbrake
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Airbrake is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Airbrake is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Frictionless error monitoring and performance insights for your entire app stack.
- For
- Developers
- Free plan or trial
- Start Free Trial airbrake.io
- Customers named
- Blinkist
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Airbrake's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: airbrake.io. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Airbrake's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Airbrake, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Airbrake by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Airbrake is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Airbrake, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.