Every category where a model named Rencore Governance for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Microsoft 365 management	IT operations and endpoint	2%	10 of 149	0%	12	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Rencore Governance yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Rencore Governance across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	2	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	3	0	3
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase21 labels6

Comparative7 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labels1

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative35 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Rencore Governance appears to be a popular and highly-regarded option.” Llama 4 Maverick · M365 management · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Choose Rencore/AvePoint/ShareGate if: You need specialized governance for specific Microsoft services” Kimi K2 · M365 management · comparative prompt · alternative

“Rencore is more advanced (and typically pricier) if you need deep compliance and audit capabilities.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · M365 management · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Most comprehensive governance coverage including Power Platform and Copilot agents” GLM 4.7 FlashX · M365 management · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Rencore Governance, over the 35 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Rencore Governance was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

CoreView24 of 3510Not among the top eight

ShareGate18 of 352Not among the top eight

Syskit Point15 of 351Not among the top eight

AvePoint Confidence Platform15 of 350Not among the top eight

Microsoft Purview12 of 354Not among the top eight

Orchestry9 of 351Not among the top eight

Microsoft 365 Admin Center8 of 353Not among the top eight

AdminDroid8 of 351Not among the top eight

ManageEngine M365 Manager Plus8 of 351Not among the top eight

ShareGate Protect5 of 351Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Rencore Governance. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 35 of the 35 answers that named Rencore Governance and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com29

rencore.comYour site25

expertinsights.com22

marketplace.microsoft.com20

coreview.com18

microsoft.com17

cloudfuze.com14

learn.microsoft.com13

sourceforge.net11

itechguides.com10

154 of the 179 domain citations in answers naming Rencore Governance came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

g2.com/categories/microsoft-365-management-tools23

expertinsights.com/it-management/the-top-microsoft-365-management-tools22

rencore.com/en/microsoft-365-governance-tool-alternatives20

cloudfuze.com/microsoft-365-management12

marketplace.microsoft.com/en-us/product/saas/rencoregmbh.rencore_governance11

marketplace.microsoft.com/en-us/product/web-apps/rencoregmbh.rencore_oversight11

g2.com/categories/microsoft-365-management-tools/enterprise10

sourceforge.net/software/microsoft-365-management9

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

rencore.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Rencore Governance takes 2% of first choices and CoreView takes 20%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “microsoft 365 management tool”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “microsoft 365 management tools”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 10 a month (“rencore governance”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 716 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 440 · 4 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 1,324
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

4 ads · 2 text, 1 image, 1 video · 0 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2025, as Rencore, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 2 in the year, 2 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 10 of 149 in M365 management

Segment leader

20%

CoreView

First choices: 7 across its categories
Named in: 35 answers
Its own site cited: in 35 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on rencore.com

1,774

subdomains included

Content

656

counted in the table below

Documentation

464

Product · Integration

40 · 45

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Report or ebook	432	undated		AI coding, DLP
Blog	156	13	2026-10-02	DLP, IGA
Glossary or explainer	33	1	2026-07-08
Comparison	13	undated
Case study	9	undated
Webinar or virtual event	5	undated
Template or tool	5	undated
Conference or event	2	undated
News or press	1	0	2025-11-27

Most recent

2026-10-02One control plane for every ai blog
2026-09-29Ai adoption is finished blog
2026-09-25Four consoles one person blog
2026-09-22Ai has outgrown the silo blog
2026-09-10Tackling nis2 what microsoft purview can and cant do for you blog
2026-09-07Introducing reviews access certification microsoft teams blog

Events in person

Last twelve months

April 27, 2026 to April 28, 2026Gartner Digital Workplace SummitLondon, UK · exhibited
March 23, 2026 to March 24, 2026Gartner Digital Workplace SummitSan Diego · exhibited

As the event pages on rencore.com state them, read October 5, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page rencore.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as Rencore Governance

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Rencore Governance; a claim can dispute any of them.

Rencore 5

Follow Rencore Governance

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Rencore Governance is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: one control plane to inventory, govern, and enforce Microsoft 365, Power Platform, Copilot, and AI agents
rencore.com
For: governance and security teams
rencore.com
Price stated: Request pricing for any plan rencore.com/en/pricing
Free plan or trial: Start free trial rencore.com
Certifications: SOC 2 Type 2ISO 27001:2022ISO 27017GDPRSOC2 Type 2ISO 27001SOC 2
Hosting: Microsoft AzureEUSwitzerlandthe USAustraliaEU/DECHUS
Customers named: Universitätsspital BaselVille de LuxembourgRoyal BAMSpecialist Risk GroupWacker Chemie AGPetrochemie-DienstleisterDie WKO im ÜberblickYoko:10
Not stated on the pages read: Starting price, integrations

What Rencore Governance's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: rencore.com, rencore.com/en/pricing, trust.rencore.com, rencore.com/en/code/features, rencore.com/de/resources/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Rencore Governance's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Rencore Governance, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Rencore Governance by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Rencore Governance is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Rencore Governance, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.