Every category where a model named Orchestry for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Microsoft 365 management	IT operations and endpoint	0%	23 of 149	9%	11	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Orchestry yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Orchestry across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	3	0	0	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	2	0	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct10 labels3

Paraphrase5 labels1

Comparative11 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained5 labels1

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative34 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Shortlist platforms with mid-market pricing and proven 500-2k user deployments: CoreView, AvePoint Cloud Governance, ShareGate, AdminDroid, Syskit Point/Orchestry.” Muse Glimmer 30B · M365 management · scale prompt · alternative

“A superb governance and lifecycle tool specifically designed to eliminate Teams sprawl and automate provisioning via templates.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · M365 management · scale prompt · alternative

“Go with Orchestry if your primary goal is to guide users through structured workspace creation, stop Teams sprawl” Gemini 3.5 Flash · M365 management · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Offers AI-enabled license optimization with dormant-account detection and governance reporting” Claude Haiku 4.5 · M365 management · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“More limited in governance enforcement” DeepSeek V4 Flash · M365 management · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Orchestry, over the 34 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Orchestry was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

CoreView24 of 347Not among the top eight

ShareGate17 of 342Not among the top eight

Syskit Point14 of 341Not among the top eight

AvePoint Confidence Platform12 of 341Not among the top eight

AdminDroid11 of 343Not among the top eight

Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 36510 of 340Not among the top eight

Rencore Governance9 of 341Not among the top eight

ManageEngine M365 Manager Plus9 of 340Not among the top eight

Microsoft 365 Admin Center5 of 342Not among the top eight

inforcer5 of 341Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Orchestry. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 34 of the 34 answers that named Orchestry and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com33

expertinsights.com22

microsoft.com18

coreview.com17

sourceforge.net17

cloudfuze.com13

itechguides.com10

us.fitgap.com10

learn.microsoft.com9

rencore.com9

158 of the 158 domain citations in answers naming Orchestry came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

expertinsights.com/it-management/the-top-microsoft-365-management-tools22

g2.com/categories/microsoft-365-management-tools22

g2.com/categories/microsoft-365-management-tools/enterprise17

sourceforge.net/software/microsoft-365-management15

cloudfuze.com/microsoft-365-management12

microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/enterprise/microsoft-365-plans-and-pricing9

coreview.com/blog/5-office-365-management-tools-every-microsoft-admin-should-consider8

mrsharepoint.com/best-microsoft-365-governance-tools8

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

orchestry.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Orchestry takes 0% of first choices and CoreView takes 20%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “microsoft 365 management tool”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “microsoft 365 management tools”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 260 a month (“orchestry”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 4 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 1,300 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 630 · 14 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 831
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

28 ads · 15 text, 8 image, 5 video · 6 shown in the last 30 days

First shown April 2025, as Orchestry Software Inc, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 20 in the year, 8 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 23 of 149 in M365 management

Segment leader

20%

CoreView

First choices: 5 across its categories
Named in: 34 answers
Its own site cited: in 34 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on orchestry.com

455

subdomains included

Content

409

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

20 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	309	17	2026-10-01	M365 management
Conference or event	36	0	2024-03-11
Webinar or virtual event	35	undated		DSPM
Comparison	12	0	2026-06-17
News or press	6	0	2024-08-07
Case study	4	undated
Template or tool	3	0	2026-04-09
Report or ebook	2	undated
Glossary or explainer	2	0	2026-07-06	DSPM

Most recent

2026-10-01Manage microsoft 365 guest access in one place blog
2026-09-25M365 agent readiness blog
2026-09-25Zombie agent lifecycle management blog
2026-09-09Sharepoint permission inheritance blog
2026-09-01M365 ai agent governance blog
2026-09-01M365 agent inventory blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page orchestry.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Orchestry

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Orchestry is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Microsoft 365 Governance & Management
orchestry.com
For: IT teams
orchestry.com
Price stated: Starter: Starting at $2,499 tenant/year; Professional: Starting at $4,999 tenant/year; Enterprise: Starting at $7,499 tenant/year orchestry.com/pricing
Starting price: 2499 orchestry.com/pricing
Free plan or trial: Get a free trial orchestry.com
Certifications: SOC 2 Type II CertifiedGDPR CompliantGDPRISO/IEC 27001:2022SOC 2 Type 2
Hosting: same region as your tenantsame Azure geo where your tenant is hostedGlobalUS
Customers named: Monash HealthWelocalizeFivePBurges Salmon LLP
Not stated on the pages read: Integrations

What Orchestry's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: orchestry.com, orchestry.com/pricing, trust.orchestry.com, orchestry.com/solutions/legal. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Orchestry's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Orchestry, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Orchestry by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Orchestry is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Orchestry, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.