Every category where a model named Syskit Point for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Microsoft 365 management	IT operations and endpoint	5%	6 of 149	6%	17	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Syskit Point yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Syskit Point across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	1	0	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	2	0	1	4
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	1	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	1	0	0	1
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	2	0	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct8 labels2

Paraphrase12 labels3

Comparative15 labelsNone

Budget-constrained4 labelsNone

Scale-constrained4 labels1

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative43 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Go with Syskit Point if your biggest worry is B2B security, external guest users oversharing data, and preparing for security audits.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · M365 management · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“CoreView and Syskit Point are frequently recommended for mid-market and enterprise environments” Mistral Small · M365 management · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“I'd shortlist ShareGate Protect, Syskit Point, and CoreView” DeepSeek V4 Flash · M365 management · scale prompt · first choice

“Shortlist platforms with mid-market pricing and proven 500-2k user deployments: CoreView, AvePoint Cloud Governance, ShareGate, AdminDroid, Syskit Point/Orchestry.” Muse Glimmer 30B · M365 management · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Limited to 5 services; weaker admin automation” DeepSeek V4 Flash · M365 management · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Syskit Point, over the 43 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Syskit Point was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

CoreView33 of 4311Compare →

AdminDroid23 of 4310Compare →

ShareGate21 of 431Not among the top eight

AvePoint Confidence Platform20 of 430Not among the top eight

Microsoft 365 Admin Center15 of 436Compare →

Rencore Governance15 of 431Not among the top eight

Orchestry14 of 431Not among the top eight

CIPP10 of 430Compare →

Microsoft 365 Lighthouse9 of 431Not among the top eight

ManageEngine M365 Manager Plus9 of 430Compare →

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Syskit Point. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 43 of the 43 answers that named Syskit Point and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com39

expertinsights.com27

microsoft.com23

us.fitgap.com22

coreview.com21

rencore.com19

sourceforge.net18

admindroid.com16

learn.microsoft.com16

marketplace.microsoft.com16

217 of the 217 domain citations in answers naming Syskit Point came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

g2.com/categories/microsoft-365-management-tools35

expertinsights.com/it-management/the-top-microsoft-365-management-tools27

rencore.com/en/microsoft-365-governance-tool-alternatives18

syncrosecure.com/blog/best-microsoft-365-management-tools-for-msps15

admindroid.com/microsoft365/compare/microsoft-365-management-tools14

sourceforge.net/software/microsoft-365-management14

us.fitgap.com/search/office-365-management-tools/small-business13

msp.toolsinfo.com/c/m365-management/guide12

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

syskit.com ranks first on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Syskit Point takes 5% of first choices and CoreView takes 20%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “microsoft 365 management tool”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “microsoft 365 management tools”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 90 a month (“syskit point”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 12,411 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 3,467 · 90 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 1,829
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

108 ads · 77 text, 20 image, 11 video · 45 shown in the last 30 days

First shown December 2022, as SYSKIT d.o.o., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 50 in the year, 58 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 6 of 149 in M365 management

Segment leader

20%

CoreView

First choices: 6 across its categories
Named in: 43 answers
Its own site cited: in 43 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on syskit.com

721

subdomains included

Content

514

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

65 · 41

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	287	9	2026-10-02	DLP
Webinar or virtual event	93	undated
Glossary or explainer	53	0	2024-10-01	DLP
Report or ebook	28	undated		MFA
Conference or event	23	0	2024-10-01
Case study	17	undated
Comparison	7	0	2024-10-01
Template or tool	5	1	2026-09-11
News or press	1	undated

Most recent

2026-10-02Hipaa audit log retention requirements blog
2026-09-28Sharepoint otp retirement blog
2026-09-14Sharepoint content sprawl ai blog
2026-09-14M365 tenants arent ready for ai blog
2026-09-11Microsoft 365 security checklist template or tool
2026-09-11Enterprise data protection copilot blog

Events in person

Upcoming

November 17, 2026 to November 20, 2026Microsoft Ignite 2026place not stated · exhibits
December 1, 2026 to December 3, 2026Syskit is at ESPC 2026 in AmsterdamAmsterdam · exhibits

As the event pages on syskit.com state them, read October 5, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page syskit.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as Syskit Point

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Syskit Point; a claim can dispute any of them.

SysKit Point 1

Follow Syskit Point

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Syskit Point is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Microsoft 365 Governance Layer; keeps your Microsoft 365 environment under control - secured, cost-optimized, and AI confident.
syskit.com
For: IT teams; security teams; organizations in regulated industries
syskit.com
Price stated: Starting at $12 per user per year; Starting at $24 per user per year; Starting at $36 per user per year; Custom pricing per user, per year syskit.com/pricing
Starting price: 12 syskit.com/pricing
Free plan or trial: Try for free syskit.com
Certifications: SOC 2 Type 2ISO 27001:2022Microsoft 365 App Compliance
Hosting: your own Azure tenantthe Azure region of your choicebeyond the standard three locationsUS, EU, Australia, based on Customer's choiceEUWorldwide
Customers named: STADA ArzneimittelLotus CarsOvative GroupRedgate SoftwareRimac GroupIATASTADA Arzneimittel AGHub International
Not stated on the pages read: Integrations

What Syskit Point's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: syskit.com, syskit.com/pricing, trust.syskit.com, syskit.com/features, syskit.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Syskit Point's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Syskit Point, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Syskit Point by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Syskit Point is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Syskit Point, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.