| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Load balancers | Network and edge | 4% | 6 of 94 | 12% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by HAProxy at 29% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If I had to choose one as the default recommendation for most mid-sized B2B firms, it would be Radware” Perplexity Sonar · Load balancers · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“The best load balancer for a company with a limited budget is Radware Alteon, according to Gitnux.” Llama 4 Maverick · Load balancers · budget prompt · first choice
“Other options to consider are NetScaler ADC and Radware's application delivery solutions.” Llama 4 Maverick · Load balancers · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Radware Alteon is described as the budget-lean alternative in one 2026 comparison” Perplexity Sonar · Load balancers · budget prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid purchasing enterprise-grade ADCs (like F5, A10, or Radware)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Load balancers · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 20 of the 20 answers that named Radware Alteon and are not a share of its labels.
Sixty-six of the seventy-eight domain citations in answers naming Radware Alteon came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Radware Alteon's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: radware.com/products/alteon, radware.com/about/why-radware, radware.com/partners/cisco-adc, radware.com/products/alteon-models, radware.com/products/alteon-resources. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Radware Alteon's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Radware Alteon, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Radware Alteon by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: