| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bot management | Network and edge | 0% | 43 of 83 | 36% | 11 | criticized challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“a non-intrusive API-based Bot Management solution to detect, eliminate, and manage bot traffic” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Bot management · direct prompt · alternative
“Radware Bot Manager and Akamai Bot Manager are also strong contenders” Perplexity Sonar · Bot management · direct prompt · alternative
“Radware (strong for large enterprises, but requires ongoing tuning)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Bot management · negative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“enterprise-heavy options like Imperva, Akamai, or Radware (often custom-priced in the thousands)” Grok 4.20 · Bot management · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“described as enterprise-grade and potentially cost-prohibitive for SMBs” Perplexity Sonar · Bot management · budget prompt · soft negative
“Radware reviews note occasional blocks on legitimate crawlers or users” Grok 4.20 · Bot management · negative prompt · soft negative
“Reporting customization limited” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Bot management · scale prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 43 of the 44 answers that named Radware Bot Manager and are not a share of its labels.
148 of the 178 domain citations in answers naming Radware Bot Manager came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Radware Bot Manager's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: radware.com/bot-management-q3-2024, radware.com/qks-bot-management-q3-2025, radware.com/e-commerce-bot-threat-report, radware.com/2022-spark-matrix-bot-management, radware.com/2023-spark-matrix-bot-management. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Radware Bot Manager's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Radware Bot Manager, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Radware Bot Manager by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: