Every category where a model named Google Security Command Center for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Cloud security posture management	Cloud and infrastructure	2%	8 of 53	11%	9	under 10 labels · led by Wiz at 43%
Cloud-native application protection	Cloud and infrastructure	0%	56 of 57	100%	2	under 10 labels · led by Wiz at 46%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Google Security Command Center yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Google Security Command Center across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	1	0	0	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	1	1	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	0	1
Mistral Small	0	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative4 labelsNone

Budget-constrained12 labels1

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative15 labels2not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative34 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“GCP-only or mostly GCP: Google Security Command Center is the native choice” GPT-5.4 mini · CSPM · budget prompt · first choice

“GCP: Security Command Center provides free foundational security findings” Kimi K2 · CSPM · budget prompt · alternative

“Choose Google SCC if your environment is primarily Google Cloud.” GPT-5.4 mini · CSPM · comparative prompt · alternative

“if you want zero-extra cost and only operate in one cloud” GLM 4.7 FlashX · CSPM · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid relying exclusively on ... Google Security Command Center as your primary CNAPP.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · CNAPP · negative prompt · hard negative

“Relying solely on the free or low-cost native posture management tools provided by your cloud provider” Gemini 3.5 Flash · CSPM · negative prompt · soft negative

“Incentive misalignment: They are optimized for their own clouds” Kimi K2 · CNAPP · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Google Security Command Center, over the 34 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Google Security Command Center was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Microsoft Defender for Cloud34 of 346Not in the top three

Wiz32 of 345Not in the top three

Prisma Cloud28 of 341Not in the top three

AWS Security Hub22 of 340Not in the top three

Orca Security19 of 343Not in the top three

Prowler18 of 3411Not in the top three

Lacework FortiCNAPP9 of 340Not in the top three

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security8 of 340Not in the top three

Orca8 of 340Not in the top three

Check Point CloudGuard6 of 340Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Google Security Command Center. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 28 of the 34 answers that named Google Security Command Center and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cyberpress.org19

cloudaware.com15

gbhackers.com15

cybersecuritynews.com13

busistack.com12

orca.security12

complyjet.com11

aikido.dev9

azure.microsoft.com7

cloudgovernancecost.com6

119 of the 119 domain citations in answers naming Google Security Command Center came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cyberpress.org/cspm-tools-by-business-size-215

cloudaware.com/blog/top-cloud-security-posture-management-vendors13

busistack.com/best-cloud-security-posture-management-tools-202612

complyjet.com/blog/best-cspm-tools11

gbhackers.com/best-cspm-compared11

cybersecuritynews.com/best-cspm-tools9

orca.security/resources/blog/best-cspm-tools9

cloudgovernancecost.com/tools6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Google Security Command Center

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Google Security Command Center; a claim can dispute any of them.

Security Command Center 2GCP Security Command Center 1GCP Security Command Center (Standard) 1GCP Security Command Center standard edition 1Google Cloud Security Command Center 1Google Cloud Security Command Center (SCC) 1Google Cloud Security Command Center (Standard Tier) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Google Security Command Center's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Google Security Command Center, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at google.dev is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.