Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 9 → 10 of 51
1 category · Named, not rankedBraintrust Gateway
21Judge labels
0First choices
2Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
9 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Braintrust Gateway was named 9 times in LLM gateways, where LiteLLM led with 31%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business11 of 53
0%7 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market17 of 69
0%9 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise36 of 87
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
In llm gateways · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Braintrust Gateway for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LLM gateways and observability | Data platform | 0% | 17 of 69 | 11% | 9 | under 10 labels · led by LiteLLM at 31% | ▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Braintrust Gateway held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · LLM gateways · by segment
Mid-market▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 5 → 16 of 54
Enterprise▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 4 → 46 of 75
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LLM gateways | 4% | 0% | ▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 5 → 17 of 69 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Braintrust Gateway across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Braintrust Gateway across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase11 labelsNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative5 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative21 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“For product teams heavily focused on evaluation. Ties your gateway traffic directly into testing, prompt playgrounds, and model evals.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · LLM gateways · scale prompt · alternative
“Consider Braintrust Gateway if your top priority is deep tracing tied tightly to an observability/evaluation workflow” Perplexity Sonar · LLM gateways · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“The Catch: Considerably more expensive than Portkey or self-hosting” Gemini 3.5 Flash · LLM gateways · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Strong eval/feedback integration, request-level tracing” Grok 4.20 · LLM gateways · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“$249/month starting price and eval-first focus may be overkill” Kimi K2 · LLM gateways · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Braintrust Gateway, over the 21 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Braintrust Gateway was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Braintrust Gateway, over the 21 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Braintrust Gateway was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Braintrust Gateway. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 21 of the 21 answers that named Braintrust Gateway and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
braintrust.devYour site12
getmaxim.ai12
dataiku.com11
respan.ai8
openrouter.ai7
portkey.ai7
firecrawl.dev6
inworld.ai6
orq.ai6
dev.to5
Sixty-eight of the eighty domain citations in answers naming Braintrust Gateway came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
braintrust.dev ranks 5 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Braintrust Gateway takes 0% of first choices and LiteLLM takes 31%.ShowHide
Search and answers
braintrust.dev ranks 5 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Braintrust Gateway takes 0% of first choices and LiteLLM takes 31%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “llm gateway”
6
Position for “llm gateways”
5
- Searches for its name, Google
- 30 a month (“braintrust gateway”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 14,321 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,728 · 125 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,863
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 17 of 69 in LLM gateways
Segment leader
31%
LiteLLM
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 21 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 21 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on braintrust.dev
458
subdomains included
Content
282
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 206 | undated | Observability | ||
| Comparison | 40 | 0 | 2026-04-20 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 14 | 0 | 2026-04-20 | ||
| Case study | 13 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 8 | 6 | 2026-10-07 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-10-072026 10 07 evals foundations conference or event
- 2026-09-162026 09 16 active observability conference or event
- 2026-09-092026 09 09 evals foundations conference or event
- 2026-08-262026 08 26 financial services agents conference or event
- 2026-08-132026 08 13 evals foundations conference or event
- 2026-07-102026 07 10 evals from prod data conference or event
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page braintrust.dev exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Braintrust Gateway
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Braintrust Gateway; a claim can dispute any of them.
Braintrust 5
Follow Braintrust Gateway
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Braintrust Gateway is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Braintrust Gateway is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The active observability platform for agents
- For
- teams running agents in production
- Price stated
- Free tier available braintrust.dev
- Starting price
- 0 braintrust.dev
- Free plan or trial
- Free tier available braintrust.dev
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type IIGDPR compliantSSORBACHIPAA compliantSOC 2 Type II compliance
- Customers named
- NotionGraphiteCoursera
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, hosting
What Braintrust Gateway's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: braintrust.dev, braintrust.dev/pricing, trust.braintrust.dev, braintrust.dev/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Braintrust Gateway's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Braintrust Gateway, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Braintrust Gateway by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Braintrust Gateway is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Braintrust Gateway, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.