1 category · Named, not rankedPhoenix Security
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application security posture management | Developer platform | 4% | 7 of 70 | 0% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by Aikido Security at 37% |
Movement
By model
How each model treated Phoenix Security across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Phoenix Security is recommended as best for mid-sized enterprises seeking built-in scanning engines” Claude Haiku 4.5 · ASPM · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Phoenix Security: Best for mid-sized enterprises seeking built-in scanning engines.” Mistral Small · ASPM · direct prompt · first choice
“Phoenix Security is especially associated with contextual risk and actionable prioritization.” GPT-5.4 mini · ASPM · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best for mid-sized enterprises seeking built-in scanning engines: Phoenix Security” Muse Glimmer 30B · ASPM · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Phoenix Security, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Phoenix Security was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 11 answers that named Phoenix Security and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
Forty-six of the forty-six domain citations in answers naming Phoenix Security came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
phoenix.security is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Phoenix Security takes 4% of first choices and Aikido Security takes 37%.ShowHide
Search and answers
In search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,000 a month (“phoenix security”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 383 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 3,044 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 595 · 10 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 992
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This edition- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 11 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 11 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHide| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 291 | 11 | 2026-09-21 | ASPM, DEX | |
| Podcast or video | 73 | undated | ASPM, Cyber risk quant | ||
| Report or ebook | 22 | 1 | 2026-07-22 | ASPM | |
| Glossary or explainer | 13 | undated | ASPM | ||
| Comparison | 7 | undated | |||
| Case study | 6 | 0 | 2025-06-16 | ASPM | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 5 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 3 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-21Phoenix cli and mcp server blog
- 2026-09-13Ai sdlc the second supply chain hit blog
- 2026-09-07Sbom management cra dora system of record blog
- 2026-08-31From 40 to 800 commits ai native sdlc security blog
- 2026-08-28Cra 24 hour clock sbom vex vulnerability declaration blog
- 2026-08-05Phoenix security launches exploit hunt black hat 2026 blog
Events in person
- September 17, 2026AI Storm Security Summit London 2026Telefónica Tech offices, London · sponsored
As the event pages on phoenix.security state them, read October 5, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page phoenix.security exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.
Follow Phoenix Security
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Phoenix Security is its own company.ShowHide
The company
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Agentic ASPM Platform | Application Security Remediation
- For
- CISO; application security; developers
- Price stated
- Free /mo; £1,495 /mo; Contact phoenix.security/pricing
- Starting price
- Free phoenix.security/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Free Assessment phoenix.security
- Integrations claimed
- 30 phoenix.security · 2 phoenix.security/pricing pages disagree
- Customers named
- ClearBankBazaarvoiceCapcoFNZSecurity JourneyTwinstake
- Not stated on the pages read
- Certifications, hosting
What Phoenix Security's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: phoenix.security, phoenix.security/pricing, phoenix.security/security, phoenix.security/platform-end-user-agreement, phoenix.security/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Phoenix Security's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Phoenix Security, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Phoenix Security by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Phoenix Security is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Phoenix Security, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.