| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI security platforms | Security operations | 0% | 37 of 233 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by SentinelOne Singularity at 11% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Broadest platform — covers runtime security, model scanning, red teaming, and agent security... Best for: Large enterprises that want end-to-end AI security from one vendor” DeepSeek V4 Flash · AI security · comparative prompt · first choice
“Best for: large enterprises that want a broad, lifecycle platform for AI security... Palo Alto positions Prisma AIRS as covering the full AI attack surface” GPT-5.4 mini · AI security · comparative prompt · first choice
“A strong candidate for a large, mixed environment; compare its breadth against the complexity and cost” GPT-6 Luna · AI security · comparative prompt · first choice
“Best for AI workload/runtime security: Prisma AIRS” Perplexity Sonar · AI security · comparative prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 11 answers that named Palo Alto Networks Prisma AIRS and are not a share of its labels.
Thirty-seven of the forty-seven domain citations in answers naming Palo Alto Networks Prisma AIRS came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Palo Alto Networks Prisma AIRS's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: docs.paloaltonetworks.com/prisma-airs, paloaltonetworks.com/ai-security/prisma-airs, docs.paloaltonetworks.com/prisma-airs/ai-gateway, docs.paloaltonetworks.com/prisma-airs/ai-inventory, docs.paloaltonetworks.com/prisma-airs/release-notes. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Palo Alto Networks Prisma AIRS's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Palo Alto Networks Prisma AIRS, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Palo Alto Networks Prisma AIRS by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: