AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Check Point · October 2026 Edition
11 categories · Ranked

Check Point

32Judge labels
1First choices
10Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
11Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in AI security for mid-market buyers
Rank 53 of 233 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 3 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market53 of 233
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise18 of 155
2%5 labels
under the label threshold
In ai security · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Check Point for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
AI security platformsSecurity operations0%53 of 2330%3under 10 labels · led by SentinelOne Singularity at 11%
Data loss preventionSecurity operations0%32 of 890%2under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Purview DLP at 46%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Attack surface managementSecurity operations0%40 of 1000%1under 10 labels · led by Intruder at 49%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
DNS filteringNetwork and edge0%47 of 940%1under 10 labels · led by DNSFilter at 59%
Endpoint detection and responseSecurity operations0%23 of 550%1under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Defender for Endpoint at 30%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Network access controlNetwork and edge0%72 of 1110%1under 10 labels · led by Portnox Cloud at 35%
Network detection and responseSecurity operations0%69 of 1020%1under 10 labels · led by ManageEngine NetFlow Analyzer at 21%
OT and IoT securitySecurity operations0%60 of 1070%1under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Defender for IoT at 21%
SaaS security posture managementSecurity operations0%59 of 950%1under 10 labels · led by Wing Security at 30%
SD-WANNetwork and edge0%48 of 73100%1under 10 labels · led by Fortinet Secure SD-WAN at 50%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Web application firewallsNetwork and edge0%52 of 820%1under 10 labels · led by Cloudflare WAF at 69%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Check Point yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Check Point across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00101
Gemini 3.5 Flash00011
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2002103
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash00202
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500202
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B01102

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct7 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative7 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labels1
Scale-constrained4 labelsNone
Negative12 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative32 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Reputable options frequently praised (2024-2026 reviews): Palo Alto Cortex XDR, CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne Singularity, Darktrace, Vectra AI, Check Point” Grok 4.20 · AI security · negative prompt · alternative
“Ranks first in 2026 vendor round-ups on the strength of what it can see and what it already runs at scale” Muse Glimmer 30B · AI security · comparative prompt · alternative
“or Check Point (top trending)” Grok 4.20 · ASM · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“their SD-WAN capabilities are often rudimentary” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SD-WAN · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Check Point, over the 32 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Check Point was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
CrowdStrike7 of 321Not among the top eight
SentinelOne Singularity7 of 321Not among the top eight
Forcepoint DLP5 of 321Not among the top eight
Microsoft Purview DLP5 of 321Not among the top eight
Palo Alto Networks5 of 321Not among the top eight
Darktrace5 of 320Not among the top eight
Cloudflare WAF4 of 321Not among the top eight
AWS WAF4 of 320Not among the top eight
Cisco4 of 320Not among the top eight
Digital Guardian4 of 320Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Check Point. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 28 of the 32 answers that named Check Point and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

checkpoint.comYour site18
gartner.com10
g2.com8
paloaltonetworks.com8
strac.io8
cyera.com7
underdefense.com7
forrester.com6
guideflow.com6
bankinfosecurity.com5

Sixty-five of the eighty-three domain citations in answers naming Check Point came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

checkpoint.com/cyber-hub/threat-prevention/what-is-data-loss-prevention/top-6-data-loss-pr6
cyera.com/blog/ai-security-platforms5
gartner.com/en/research/magic-quadrant5
checkpoint.com/cyber-hub/tools-vendors/best-ai-security-companies-in-20264
strac.io/blog/top-7-data-loss-prevention-solutions-comparison-and-dlp-evaluation-checklist4
strac.io/blog/top-data-loss-prevention-dlp-tools4
underdefense.com/blog/dlp-solutions4
currentware.com/blog/best-data-loss-prevention-software3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

checkpoint.com ranks 5 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Check Point takes 0% of first choices and SentinelOne Singularity takes 11%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “ai security platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “ai security platforms”
5
Searches for its name, Google
14,800 a month (“check point”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
4,487 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 370,648 a month
Searches its site ranks for
39,811 · 1,920 in the top three
Sites linking to it
61,243
Paid Google search
2 searches its ads show for, about 12 clicks and $255 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
98+ ads · 98 text · 48 shown in the last 30 days

First shown January 2026, as Check Point SSE Solutions Ltd, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 98 in the year. 22 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 53 of 233 in AI security
Segment leader
11%
SentinelOne Singularity
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
32 answers
Its own site cited
in 28 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on checkpoint.com
2,815
subdomains included
Content
1,937
counted in the table below
Documentation
183
Product · Integration
29 · 186
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Glossary or explainer872undatedEmail security, WAF
News or press707undatedEmail security, SASE
Case study234undated
Comparison9402020-09-29EDR, MDR
Conference or event12undated
Blog5undated
Webinar or virtual event5undated
Podcast or video5undatedSASE, Email security
Report or ebook3undated

Most recent

Events in person

Upcoming
Last twelve months

As the event pages on checkpoint.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page checkpoint.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name email security (31); 35 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Check Point

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Check Point; a claim can dispute any of them.
Check Point / Barracuda 1Fortinet/Check Point 1

Follow Check Point

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Check Point is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
leading provider of cyber security solutions to corporate enterprises and governments globally
checkpoint.com
For
corporate enterprises and governments globally
checkpoint.com
Certifications
ISO 27001SOC2ISAE 3402ISO/IEC 27001 certified
Customers named
HallmarkAlkem LaboratoriesClarksMidCoast CouncilDenver BroncosSt. Joseph's Healthcare HamiltonSarajevogasRotana
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, integrations, hosting

What Check Point's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: checkpoint.com, checkpoint.com/harmony/email-security/plans-and-packages, checkpoint.com/privacy/security, checkpoint.com/products, checkpoint.com/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Check Point's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Check Point, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Check Point by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Check Point is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Check Point, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at checkpoint.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.