EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 33 of 51, unchanged
1 category · Named, not rankedOptro, formerly AuditBoard
3Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
2 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Optro, formerly AuditBoard was named 1 time in Compliance automation, where Drata led with 34%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market33 of 67
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprise36 of 54
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In compliance automation · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Optro, formerly AuditBoard for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compliance automation | Security operations | 0% | 33 of 67 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Drata at 34% |
Movement
Since September 2026, Optro, formerly AuditBoard held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Compliance automation · by segment
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compliance automation | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 33 of 67, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Optro, formerly AuditBoard across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Optro, formerly AuditBoard across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Large enterprise risk, audit and policy governance → Optro/AuditBoard” Muse Glimmer 30B · Compliance automation · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Optro, formerly AuditBoard, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Optro, formerly AuditBoard was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Optro, formerly AuditBoard, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Optro, formerly AuditBoard was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Optro, formerly AuditBoard. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 3 answers that named Optro, formerly AuditBoard and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
optro.aiYour site2
prnewswire.com2
vanta.com2
anaconda.com1
bigid.com1
capterra.com1
centraleyes.com1
compliancepipe.com1
complylayer.com1
compyl.com1
Eleven of the thirteen domain citations in answers naming Optro, formerly AuditBoard came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
optro.ai ranks 5 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Optro, formerly AuditBoard takes 0% of first choices and Drata takes 34%.ShowHide
Search and answers
optro.ai ranks 5 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Optro, formerly AuditBoard takes 0% of first choices and Drata takes 34%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “compliance automation platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “compliance automation platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Organic visits to its site
- about 126,117 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 9,596 · 1,715 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 5,057
- Paid Google search
- 4 searches its ads show for, about 315 clicks and $4,599 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 33 of 67 in compliance automation
Segment leader
34%
Drata
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 3 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 3 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on optro.ai
2,141
subdomains included
Content
1,892
counted in the table below
Documentation
2
Product · Integration
24 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,358 | undated | GRC, TPRM | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 293 | undated | GRC, TPRM | ||
| Report or ebook | 87 | 9 | 2026-09-25 | GRC, TPRM | |
| Case study | 79 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 26 | undated | GRC | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 20 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 13 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 12 | undated | GRC | ||
| Podcast or video | 2 | undated | |||
| News or press | 2 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-25Vendor sprawl guide report or ebook
- 2026-09-15Risk in focus 2027 north america report or ebook
- 2026-09-09G sib report report or ebook
- 2026-09-08Bcm reality checklist report or ebook
- 2026-08-25Agentic ai playbook for auditors report or ebook
- 2026-08-05Agentic ai report report or ebook
Events in person
Upcoming
- October 12, 2026 to October 14, 2026Infosec World 2026Gaylord Palms, Orlando
- October 13, 2026 to October 15, 2026in-person experienceSan Diego · takes part
- October 13, 2026AI & GRC WorkshopGaylord Pacific Resort, San Diego · takes part
- October 13, 2026 to October 15, 2026CRX (Connected Risk Experience)Gaylord Pacific Resort, San Diego · takes part
- November 10, 2026 to November 11, 2026#RISK Expo Europe 2026ExCeL London, London, U.K.
Last twelve months
- September 28, 2026 to September 29, 2026Gartner Enterprise Risk, Audit and Compliance Conference — EMEALondon, U.K.
- September 27, 2026 to September 29, 2026MBA Compliance and Risk Management ConferenceGrand Hyatt, Washington
- September 15, 2026 to September 16, 2026Gartner Enterprise Risk, Audit and Compliance Conference — AmericasGrapevine
- August 17, 2026 to August 19, 2026GRC Conference 2026 (ISACA and The IIA)Gaylord Pacific Resort and Convention Center, San Diego
As the event pages on optro.ai state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page optro.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name GRC (94); 2 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Optro, formerly AuditBoard
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Optro, formerly AuditBoard is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Optro, formerly AuditBoard is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI-powered GRC software
- For
- enterprises
- Certifications
- ISO 27001NIST 800-53SSAE-18 SOC 2Cloud Security Alliance STARHIPAASOC 2 Type IISOC 1 Type IICCPA
- Customers named
- Arthur J. GallagherTeradataPetSmartMDANvidiaCiscoUberSnowflake
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting
What Optro, formerly AuditBoard's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: optro.ai, optro.ai/pricing, trust.optro.ai, optro.ai/platform, optro.ai/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Optro, formerly AuditBoard's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Optro, formerly AuditBoard, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Optro, formerly AuditBoard by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Optro, formerly AuditBoard is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Optro, formerly AuditBoard, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.