IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › Compyl · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Compyl

9Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

5 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Compyl was named 5 times in GRC and 1 other category, where Vanta led with 14%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market22 of 77

under the label threshold

Enterprise26 of 47

under the label threshold

In grc · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Compyl for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
GRC platforms	Security operations	0%	22 of 77	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Vanta at 14%
Compliance automation	Security operations	0%	42 of 54	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Drata at 37%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Compyl yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Compyl across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	2	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Tier 2: Flexible Mid-Market GRC Platforms (e.g., Hyperproof, Compyl, RealCISO, LogicGate)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · GRC · scale prompt · alternative

“Compyl or LogicGate Risk Cloud (Best for Custom Risk & Vendor Management)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · GRC · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Best for broader integrated GRC: Hyperproof or Compyl” Perplexity Sonar · GRC · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Compyl, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Compyl was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Vanta9 of 92Not in the top three

Hyperproof8 of 92Not in the top three

Drata8 of 90Not in the top three

AuditBoard5 of 92Not in the top three

MetricStream5 of 90Not in the top three

OneTrust5 of 90Not in the top three

LogicGate Risk Cloud4 of 91Not in the top three

LogicGate3 of 90Not in the top three

Secureframe3 of 90Not in the top three

SureCloud2 of 91Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Compyl. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 9 answers that named Compyl and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

compyl.comYour site6

expertinsights.com4

optro.ai3

surecloud.com3

vanta.com3

auditxyz.com2

complyjet.com2

enzuzo.com2

guptadeepak.com2

orbiqhq.com2

Twenty-three of the twenty-nine domain citations in answers naming Compyl came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

compyl.com/blog/best-grc-platforms-20264

auditxyz.com/compare/best-compliance-automation-platforms2

enzuzo.com/blog/best-grc-software2

expertinsights.com/compliance/the-top-compliance-automation-tools2

expertinsights.com/compliance/the-top-governance-risk-compliance-grc-platforms2

optro.ai/blog/compliance-automation-tools2

vanta.com/resources/best-grc-software-solutions-for-enterprises2

apptega.com/blog/compliance-automation-software1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Compyl's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Compyl, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at compyl.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.