Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 18 → 11 of 30
1 category · Named, not rankedOpenFeature
11Judge labels
0First choices
2Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. OpenFeature was named 3 times in Feature flags, where Flagsmith led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business11 of 36
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market13 of 35
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise27 of 34
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
In feature flags · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named OpenFeature for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feature flags | Developer platform | 0% | 13 of 35 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Flagsmith at 25% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, OpenFeature held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Feature flags · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 18 → 16 of 33
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 16 → 28 of 32
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feature flags | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 18 → 13 of 35 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated OpenFeature across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated OpenFeature across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative7 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“prioritize platforms that support OpenFeature (a CNCF-standardized, vendor-agnostic API for feature flagging)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Feature flags · negative prompt · alternative
“the current consensus recommends an OpenFeature vendor-agnostic standard rather than a single product” Muse Glimmer 30B · Feature flags · negative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as OpenFeature, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and OpenFeature was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as OpenFeature, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and OpenFeature was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named OpenFeature. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 11 answers that named OpenFeature and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
growthbook.io6
harness.io6
flagsmith.com5
guideflow.com4
launchdarkly.com4
openfeature.devYour site4
amplitude.com3
configcat.com3
statsig.com3
docs.getunleash.io2
Thirty-six of the forty domain citations in answers naming OpenFeature came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
openfeature.dev ranks 2 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, OpenFeature takes 0% of first choices and Flagsmith takes 25%.ShowHide
Search and answers
openfeature.dev ranks 2 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, OpenFeature takes 0% of first choices and Flagsmith takes 25%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “feature flag platform”
2
Position for “feature flag platforms”
5
- Searches for its name, Google
- 590 a month (“openfeature”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 1 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 1,167 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 613 · 31 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 701
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 13 of 35 in feature flags
Segment leader
25%
Flagsmith
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 11 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 10 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on openfeature.dev
218
subdomains included
Content
45
counted in the table below
Documentation
45
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 42 | 1 | 2026-08-12 | Feature flags | |
| Conference or event | 1 | 0 | 2025-11-07 | ||
| Report or ebook | 1 | 0 | 2025-06-13 | Feature flags | |
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-08-12Openfeature mid 2026 update blog
- 2026-03-28Kubecon eu 2026 recap blog
- 2026-03-19Kubecon eu 2026 blog
- 2026-02-18Governance board 2026 blog
- 2025-11-18Kubecon na 2025 recap blog
- 2025-11-07Kubecon na 2025 openfeature summit preview conference or event
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page openfeature.dev exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow OpenFeature
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
OpenFeature is its own company.ShowHide
The company
OpenFeature is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Standardizing Feature Flagging for Everyone
- Not stated on the pages read
- Who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What OpenFeature's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: openfeature.dev, openfeature.dev/community/SECURITY. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when OpenFeature's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as OpenFeature, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for OpenFeature by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where OpenFeature is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name OpenFeature, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.