Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 21 → 14 of 30
1 category · Named, not rankedAmplitude
9Judge labels
1First choices
4Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Amplitude was named 1 time in Feature flags, where Flagsmith led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business17 of 36
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market32 of 35
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprise31 of 34
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
In feature flags · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Amplitude for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feature flags | Developer platform | 0% | 32 of 35 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Flagsmith at 25% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Amplitude held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Feature flags · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 26 → 31 of 33
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 27 → 29 of 32
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feature flags | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 26 → 32 of 35 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Amplitude across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Amplitude across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labels1
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative5 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“the feature flagging capabilities in these platforms are often "second-class citizens" compared to dedicated tools” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Feature flags · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Amplitude, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Amplitude was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Amplitude, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Amplitude was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Amplitude. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 9 answers that named Amplitude and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
flagsmith.com4
growthbook.io4
harness.io4
configcat.com3
getunleash.io3
statsig.com3
youtube.com3
flint.com2
guideflow.com2
medium.com2
Thirty of the thirty domain citations in answers naming Amplitude came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
amplitude.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Amplitude takes 0% of first choices and Flagsmith takes 25%.ShowHide
Search and answers
amplitude.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Amplitude takes 0% of first choices and Flagsmith takes 25%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “feature flag platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “feature flag platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 74,000 a month (“amplitude”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 5,691 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 373,273 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 17,625 · 1,637 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 16,379
- Paid Google search
- 2 searches its ads show for, about 13 clicks and $207 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 32 of 35 in feature flags
Segment leader
25%
Flagsmith
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 9 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 7 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on amplitude.com
7,043
subdomains included
Content
3,585
counted in the table below
Documentation
991
Product · Integration
32 · 121
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,701 | 28 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 826 | 0 | 2026-05-29 | ||
| Conference or event | 370 | 5 | 2026-09-30 | ||
| Template or tool | 237 | 0 | 2026-04-06 | ||
| News or press | 193 | 0 | 2026-05-05 | ||
| Comparison | 121 | 2 | 2026-09-25 | ||
| Case study | 61 | 0 | 2026-02-17 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 42 | 1 | 2026-07-15 | ||
| Report or ebook | 30 | 0 | 2024-03-29 | ||
| Podcast or video | 4 | 0 | 2024-06-25 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-30Build ai workflows that save time conference or event
- 2026-09-28Jev analysis blog
- 2026-09-25Best mixpanel session replay alternatives comparison
- 2026-09-23Ai context configuration blog
- 2026-09-232026 09 ai use cases for product managers conference or event
- 2026-09-16Headless amplitude blog
Events in person
Last twelve months
- July 9, 2026Experimentation MeetupPeacekeeper, San Francisco, USA · took part
As the event pages on amplitude.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page amplitude.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Amplitude
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Amplitude is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Amplitude is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- From analytics to feedback to code, Amplitude brings AI into every step of building self-improving products.
- For
- product teams
- Price stated
- The industry's most generous free plans amplitude.com
- Starting price
- 0 amplitude.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Start free with 2M events per month amplitude.com
- Certifications
- SSO and project-level permissionsAdvanced permissions and SCIMData Access ControlsSOC 2 Type IISOC 1 Type IIISO 27001ISO/IEC 27001EU-US, UK Extension, and Swiss-US Data Privacy Frameworks
- Hosting
- EU data center optionUnited StatesGermanyEU
- Customers named
- FenderBackstageUdemyGongDoorDashChickDropboxAtlassian
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations
What Amplitude's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: amplitude.com, amplitude.com/pricing, trust.amplitude.com, amplitude.com/platform-updates, amplitude.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Amplitude's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Amplitude, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Amplitude by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Amplitude is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Amplitude, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.