AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Netwrix 1Secure · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Netwrix 1Secure

3Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
3 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Netwrix 1Secure was named 2 times in DLP, where Microsoft Purview DLP led with 46%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In dlp · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Netwrix 1Secure for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Data loss preventionSecurity operations2%14 of 890%2under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Purview DLP at 46%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.

Movement

Since September 2026, Netwrix 1Secure held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · DLP · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 29 of 77, unchanged
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 12 of 80, unchanged

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
DLP0%2%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.New this editionRank 14 of 89, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Netwrix 1Secure across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.2000000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash10001
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 label1
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best All-In-One Platform for Hybrid Environments: Netwrix 1Secure... If you are Microsoft-first: Start with Netwrix 1Secure.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · DLP · direct prompt · first choice
“Netwrix 1Secure is another credible mid-market option” Perplexity Sonar · DLP · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Netwrix 1Secure, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Netwrix 1Secure was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Forcepoint DLP2 of 31Not among the top eight
Microsoft Purview DLP2 of 31Not among the top eight
CurrentWare1 of 31Not among the top eight
AvePoint Confidence Platform1 of 30Not among the top eight
Safetica1 of 30Not among the top eight
Trellix XDR1 of 30Not among the top eight
Varonis Data Security Platform1 of 30Not among the top eight
Zscaler Internet Access1 of 30Not among the top eight
miniOrange DLP1 of 30Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Netwrix 1Secure. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 3 answers that named Netwrix 1Secure and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

miniorange.com3
currentware.com2
forcepoint.com2
learn.g2.com2
netwrix.comYour site2
aimultiple.com1
checkpoint.com1
cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com1
consilien.com1
cyberhaven.com1

Fourteen of the sixteen domain citations in answers naming Netwrix 1Secure came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

netwrix.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Netwrix 1Secure takes 2% of first choices and Microsoft Purview DLP takes 46%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “data loss prevention platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “data loss prevention platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Organic visits to its site
about 104,208 a month
Searches its site ranks for
17,554 · 1,072 in the top three
Sites linking to it
7,338
Paid Google search
4 searches its ads show for, about 67 clicks and $3,789 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
120+ ads · 102 text, 11 image, 7 video · 120 shown in the last 30 days

First shown April 2022, as Netwrix Corporation, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 70 in the year, 50 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
2%
rank 14 of 89 in DLP
Segment leader
46%
Microsoft Purview DLP
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
3 answers
Its own site cited
in 3 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on netwrix.com
10,010
subdomains included
Content
1,442
counted in the table below
Documentation
7,965
Product · Integration
105 · 5
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog58102025-01-16DLP, PAM
Report or ebook32602026-02-02DLP, PAM
Webinar or virtual event20872026-10-15DLP, IGA
News or press12112026-08-18PAM, IGA
Case study8502025-09-19
Comparison6042026-09-14DLP, IGA
Glossary or explainer3302025-05-07ASM, IGA
Podcast or video15undated
Conference or event902026-01-31
Template or tool412026-07-28

Events in person

Upcoming
Last twelve months

As the event pages on netwrix.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page netwrix.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Netwrix 1Secure

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Netwrix 1Secure is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Identity-first data security for enterprise AI
For
enterprise AI
Price stated
1Secure is offered in multiple tiers (N1, N3, N5) to fit different security needs and budgets. netwrix.com/en/platform
Free plan or trial
free for 14 days with full access netwrix.com/en/platform
Integrations claimed
7 netwrix.com/en/products/1secure
Certifications
SOC 2 Type I
Hosting
Canada
Customers named
Horizon Leisure CentresSamsung R&D InstituteWashington County, ArkansasMakai Ocean Engineering, Inc.Palmdale Water DistrictCRA InternationalThe Georgia Lottery Corporation4SInfoSec

What Netwrix 1Secure's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: netwrix.com/en/platform, netwrix.com/en/products/1secure, netwrix.com/en/products/1secure-msps, community.netwrix.com/t/api-per-netwrix-1secure/122092, community.netwrix.com/t/1secure-september-2026-product-update/137656. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Netwrix 1Secure's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Netwrix 1Secure, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Netwrix 1Secure by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Netwrix 1Secure is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Netwrix 1Secure, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at netwrix.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.