Every category where a model named GLPI for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
IT asset management	IT operations and endpoint	2%	8 of 61	10%	10	accepted challenger
IT service management	IT operations and endpoint	2%	6 of 48	0%	6	under 10 labels · led by Freshservice at 58%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for GLPI yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated GLPI across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	2	0	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	2	0	0	2
Mistral Small	0	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	0	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	3	0	0	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	2	0	0	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase5 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained18 labels2

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative29 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best free / open‑source choice: Snipe‑IT (self‑hosted) or GLPI (self‑hosted)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · ITAM · budget prompt · first choice

“Best: GLPI (all‑in‑one ITSM + asset mgmt) if you need CMDB.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · ITSM · budget prompt · first choice

“Cost: Free (GPL license), self-hosted ... More comprehensive than Snipe-IT, better for MSPs” Kimi K2 · ITAM · budget prompt · alternative

“Safer alternatives often mentioned: Snipe-IT (open source, transparent), GLPI” Kimi K2 · ITAM · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“tools like Snipe-IT and GLPI track licenses in terms of assigned seats but neither tool meters real usage” Claude Haiku 4.5 · ITAM · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as GLPI, over the 29 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and GLPI was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Snipe-IT16 of 2911Not in the top three

Lansweeper11 of 291Not in the top three

Freshservice10 of 292Not in the top three

Jira Service Management10 of 292Not in the top three

Spiceworks Cloud Help Desk8 of 292Not in the top three

ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus7 of 293Not in the top three

ServiceNow IT Asset Management7 of 292Not in the top three

ManageEngine AssetExplorer7 of 291Not in the top three

AssetTiger6 of 292Not in the top three

Reftab6 of 290Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named GLPI. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 24 of the 29 answers that named GLPI and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

reddit.com13

blog.invgate.com12

assetmanagement.global10

g2.com10

openmsp.ai10

rippling.com10

virima.com10

alloysoftware.com8

capterra.com8

eesel.ai8

Ninety-nine of the ninety-nine domain citations in answers naming GLPI came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

rippling.com/blog/best-it-asset-management-small-business9

alloysoftware.com/blog/best-itsm-platforms-for-small-business8

assetmanagement.global/blog/best-it-asset-management-software-for-small-businesses8

eesel.ai/blog/itsm-for-smb8

cloudnuro.ai/blog/best-itsm-tools-for-small-businesses-budget-friendly-options-with-enterp7

blog.invgate.com/free-it-asset-management-software6

reddit.com/r/sysadmin/comments/1nck487/best_it_asset_management_for_a_small_business6

virima.com/blog/top-asset-management-tools-you-need-to-know-about6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as GLPI

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as GLPI; a claim can dispute any of them.

GLPI (Gestionnaire Libre de Parc Informatique) 1GLPi 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when GLPI's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as GLPI, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at glpi-project.org is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.