IT asset management · October 2026 Edition
Lansweeper vs InvGate Asset Management
One of fourteen models named Lansweeper first on the direct prompt; two named InvGate Asset Management. Lansweeper was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and InvGate Asset Management by eleven and Lansweeper carries 45 labels and InvGate Asset Management 20, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in three categories this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
First-choice share14%8%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate11%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#5A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels4520A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Lansweeper reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Freshservice was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. Freshservice vs Lansweeper · Freshservice vs InvGate Asset Management · Snipe-IT vs Lansweeper
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the IT asset management page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
LansweeperFirst choices, of fourteen modelsInvGate Asset Management
Direct12
Paraphrase61
Comparative00
Budget-constrained01
Scale-constrained00
Negative005 against Lansweeper
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Lansweeper and InvGate Asset Management were named in the same answer twenty-two times, of the 126 answers naming Lansweeper and the 51 naming InvGate Asset Management. In those answers InvGate Asset Management took the first choice three times and Lansweeper five.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Lansweeper and InvGate Asset Management stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | ||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | ||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
Lansweeper InvGate Asset Management first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Lansweeper on the left and InvGate Asset Management on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Lansweeper and InvGate Asset Management stood in it.
Lansweeper first, InvGate Asset Management not the choice
1 of 14 modelsInvGate Asset Management was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.GPT-5.4 miniLansweeper alternatives: Flexera One IT Asset Management, ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus
InvGate Asset Management first, Lansweeper not the choice
2 of 14 modelsLansweeper was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Claude Haiku 4.5Freshservice, InvGate Asset Management alternatives: Alloy Navigator, ManageEngine AssetExplorer
MiniMax M2.5Freshservice, InvGate Asset Management alternatives: ManageEngine AssetExplorer
Neither was the first choice, one was named
7 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Gemini 3.5 FlashFreshservice alternatives: Asset Panda, InvGate Asset Management, Setyl
Perplexity SonarFreshservice alternatives: InvGate Asset Management, ServiceNow IT Asset Management
Grok 4.1 FastManageEngine AssetExplorer alternatives: Freshservice, InvGate Insight/Assets, Lansweeper
Kimi K2Freshservice alternatives: AssetSonar, InvGate Asset Management, ManageEngine AssetExplorer
GLM 4.7 FlashXFreshservice alternatives: InvGate Asset Management, Lansweeper, ManageEngine AssetExplorer
GPT-6 LunaFreshservice alternatives: Jira Service Management, Lansweeper
Muse Glimmer 30BFreshservice alternatives: InvGate Asset Management, ManageEngine AssetExplorer, SolarWinds Service Desk
Neither was named
4 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Mistral SmallFreshservice, NinjaOne alternatives: SolarWinds Service Desk
DeepSeek V4 FlashFreshservice alternatives: ManageEngine AssetExplorer, NinjaOne
Llama 4 MaverickManageEngine AssetExplorer, NinjaOne, SolarWinds Service Desk
Qwen 3.7 FlashFreshservice alternatives: ManageEngine AssetExplorer, Snipe-IT, SolarWinds Service Desk
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
Lansweeper6%#3 of 15InvGate Asset Management6%#6 of 15Mid-marketThe figures above
Lansweeper leads by six points.
Lansweeper14%#3 of 11InvGate Asset Management8%#5 of 11Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Lansweeper9%#3 of 12InvGate Asset Management9%#4 of 12What the models said about Lansweeper
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Platforms to Avoid Due to Performance/Stability Issues... it becomes "bloated."” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Who should avoid/be cautious: Small-to-midsize businesses with tight, predictable budgets who do not want to be locked into multi-year, rising-cost contracts.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“user sentiment can be mixed in some review channels, so I'd caution buyers to test reporting depth, support responsiveness, and total cost before committing” GPT-5.4 mini · negative prompt · soft negative
“Most recommended: For the majority of mid-sized B2B companies, Lansweeper offers the best balance of automated discovery, software license management, cost-effectiveness, and scalability” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd usually recommend Lansweeper if your main goal is accurate hardware + software inventory/discovery” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“The Best All-Rounder for Deep Discovery: Lansweeper ... Lansweeper is the industry standard.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about InvGate Asset Management
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“InvGate Assets is designed for mid-market organizations that need more than basic tracking but less complexity than enterprise solutions like ServiceNow.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“InvGate Assets: A mid-market ITAM solution that offers agent-based and network scanning capabilities, with a cost of $1,499 per year.” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“Best overall mid-market fit ... InvGate Asset Management is the most cited mid-market focused dedicated ITAM product” Muse Glimmer 30B · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Also compared
Freshservice vs LansweeperFreshservice vs InvGate Asset ManagementSnipe-IT vs LansweeperSnipe-IT vs InvGate Asset ManagementLansweeper vs ManageEngine AssetExplorerLansweeper vs SolarWinds Service DeskManageEngine AssetExplorer vs InvGate Asset ManagementInvGate Asset Management vs SolarWinds Service DeskAll fifteen head-to-head pages and the full ITAM standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.