Index › Vendors › Korinza · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Korinza

3Judge labels

2First choices

0Negative labels

3 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Korinza was named 3 times in GRC, where Vanta led with 14%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market10 of 77

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In grc · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Korinza for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
GRC platforms	Security operations	4%	10 of 77	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Vanta at 14%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Korinza yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Korinza across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labels1

Paraphrase1 label1

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Korinza - Best for CFOs, compliance managers, risk teams, and general counsel at mid-market companies” Llama 4 Maverick · GRC · direct prompt · first choice

“Top pick: Korinza – purpose‑built for mid‑market firms” GLM 4.7 FlashX · GRC · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“If your primary need is risk visibility and reporting, Korinza is also a strong contender.” Mistral Small · GRC · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Korinza, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Korinza was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Hyperproof2 of 31Not in the top three

Drata2 of 30Not in the top three

Sprinto2 of 30Not in the top three

AuditBoard1 of 30Not in the top three

LogicGate Risk Cloud1 of 30Not in the top three

LogicManager1 of 30Not in the top three

MetricStream1 of 30Not in the top three

OneTrust1 of 30Not in the top three

Orbiq1 of 30Not in the top three

Secureframe1 of 30Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Korinza. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 3 answers that named Korinza and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

initiarisk.com3

korinza.com3

orbiqhq.com3

saltycloud.com2

techvendorindex.com2

bdemerson.com1

comchart.com1

enzuzo.com1

expertinsights.com1

learn.g2.com1

No domain is on file for Korinza, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

initiarisk.com/resources/best-grc-software-for-mid-market-companies-20263

korinza.com/blog/best-grc-software-mid-market-20263

orbiqhq.com/compliance-automation/best-grc-software3

saltycloud.com/blog/mid-market-grc-tools-and-solutions2

techvendorindex.com/compare/best-grc-for-mid-market2

bdemerson.com/article/the-best-grc-software-a-practical-evaluation1

comchart.com/grc-software-mid-market1

enzuzo.com/blog/best-grc-software1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Korinza's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Korinza, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at the vendor's own domain is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.