Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 15 → 18 of 62
2 categories · Named, not rankedOrbiq
27Judge labels
1First choices
1Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
7 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Orbiq was named 7 times in Compliance automation and 1 other category, where Drata led with 34%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business20 of 65
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market18 of 67
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise15 of 54
0%7 labels
under the label threshold
In compliance automation · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Orbiq for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compliance automation | Security operations | 0% | 18 of 67 | 20% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Drata at 34% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| GRC platforms | Security operations | 0% | 35 of 75 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Hyperproof at 19% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Orbiq held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Compliance automation · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 16 → 17 of 64
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 17 → 15 of 51
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compliance automation | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 16 → 18 of 67 |
| GRC | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 43 → 35 of 75 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Orbiq across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Orbiq across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct12 labels1
Paraphrase6 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative27 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“EU-first companies: Look at EU-native options like Orbiq (NIS2, DORA, GDPR native)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Compliance automation · direct prompt · alternative
“If you're EU-based, consider Orbiq — it's the strongest fit for EU companies” DeepSeek V4 Flash · GRC · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“If you're EU-based, start with Orbiq for native NIS2/DORA support” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Compliance automation · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“noted for offering strong value, though they may not have the same brand recognition as Vanta or Drata” Mistral Small · Compliance automation · direct prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Orbiq, over the 27 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Orbiq was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Orbiq, over the 27 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Orbiq was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Orbiq. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 27 of the 27 answers that named Orbiq and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
orbiqhq.comYour site27
vanta.com14
complyjet.com13
expertinsights.com11
riskwatch.com6
us.fitgap.com6
netwrix.com5
optro.ai5
riskpublishing.com5
scrut.io5
Seventy of the ninety-seven domain citations in answers naming Orbiq came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
orbiqhq.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Orbiq takes 0% of first choices and Drata takes 34%.ShowHide
Search and answers
orbiqhq.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Orbiq takes 0% of first choices and Drata takes 34%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “compliance automation platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “compliance automation platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 30 a month (“orbiq”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 53 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 111 · 2 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 157
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 18 of 67 in compliance automation
Segment leader
34%
Drata
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 27 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 27 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on orbiqhq.com
969
subdomains included
Content
108
counted in the table below
Documentation
37
Product · Integration
22 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glossary or explainer | 55 | 0 | 2026-03-18 | ||
| Comparison | 27 | 0 | 2026-06-17 | ||
| Template or tool | 19 | 17 | 2026-07-27 | ||
| Blog | 7 | 1 | 2026-08-02 |
Most recent
- 2026-08-02Agent operable trust center blog
- 2026-07-27Eu pay transparency gap analysis template or tool
- 2026-07-21Nis2 management training log template or tool
- 2026-07-20Cra conformity self assessment template or tool
- 2026-07-20Gdpr subprocessor register template or tool
- 2026-07-17Dora exit strategy plan template or tool
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page orbiqhq.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Orbiq
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Orbiq is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Orbiq is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Orbiq is a Trust Center platform for B2B deals, helping you turn compliance into a revenue generator.
- For
- EU B2B teams; sales, GRC, legal, and security/compliance teams
- Price stated
- Free plan available; paid plans from EUR 85 per month. orbiqhq.com
- Starting price
- 85 orbiqhq.com
- Free plan or trial
- Forever free. Core trust center layers, API access, one admin, and 20 access grants per year; 7-day trial of the paid plan. orbiqhq.com
- Certifications
- ISO 27001
- Hosting
- EuropeFrankfurt (eu-central-1)
- Customers named
- SysarbHowNowInRehaDataGuardBontDriveLockWilloepilot
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations
What Orbiq's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: orbiqhq.com, orbiqhq.com/pricing, orbiqhq.com/use-cases/sme. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Orbiq's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Orbiq, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Orbiq by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Orbiq is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Orbiq, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.