Index › Products › IntSights · October 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

IntSights

8Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

3 / 14Models named it

2Categories

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. IntSights was named 4 times in DRP and 1 other category, where UpGuard BreachSight led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business59 of 118

under the label threshold

Mid-market51 of 86

under the label threshold

Enterprise34 of 104

under the label threshold

In drp · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named IntSights for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Digital risk protection	Security operations	0%	51 of 86	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by UpGuard BreachSight at 22%
Threat intelligence platforms	Security operations	0%	33 of 119	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by MISP at 12%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for IntSights yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated IntSights across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	1	0	2
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative1 label1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“like those from Recorded Future or Flashpoint/IntSights) rather than buying a full-blown TIP software tool” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Threat intel · negative prompt · first choice

“The Best for B2B Risk & Brand Monitoring: IntSights (by SecureWorks)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Threat intel · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as IntSights, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and IntSights was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

ZeroFox5 of 80Not among the top eight

Recorded Future3 of 81Not among the top eight

BrandShield3 of 80Not among the top eight

CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence3 of 80Not among the top eight

Digital Shadows2 of 80Not among the top eight

Group-IB Digital Risk Protection2 of 80Not among the top eight

Netcraft2 of 80Not among the top eight

Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection2 of 80Not among the top eight

ThreatConnect1 of 81Not among the top eight

Airlock Digital1 of 80Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named IntSights. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 8 answers that named IntSights and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com3

guideflow.com3

expertinsights.com2

netcraft.com2

spikerz.com2

topbusinesssoftware.com2

upguard.com2

cyble.com1

fortra.com1

gartner.com1

No domain is on file for IntSights, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/digital-risk-protection-software3

expertinsights.com/security-operations/top-digital-risk-protection-solutions2

g2.com/categories/digital-risk-protection-drp-platforms2

netcraft.com/blog/best-digital-risk-protection-providers2

spikerz.com/blog/the-10-best-digital-risk-protection-software-solutions2

topbusinesssoftware.com/categories/digital-risk-protection-drp/enterprise-orgs2

upguard.com/blog/best-digital-risk-protection-drp-software-platforms-and-solutions2

cyble.com/knowledge-hub/what-is-digital-risk-protection-drp1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as IntSights

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as IntSights; a claim can dispute any of them.

Flashpoint/IntSights 1IntSights (Rapid7) 1IntSights (by SecureWorks) 1IntSights (now part of Rapid7) 1

Follow IntSights

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when IntSights's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as IntSights, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for IntSights by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where IntSights is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name IntSights, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.