AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Archive360 · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Archive360

32Judge labels
2First choices
5Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Comms archiving for enterprise buyers
Rank 12 of 101 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 14% of its 7 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In comms archiving · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Archive360 for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Communications archiving and complianceSecurity operations2%12 of 10114%7under 10 labels · led by Smarsh Enterprise Archive at 20%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Archive360 yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Archive360 across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash00011
Llama 4 Maverick10001
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna01001
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labels1
Paraphrase6 labels1
Comparative10 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative7 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative32 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Smarsh and Archive360 are two potential solutions that offer comprehensive archiving and compliance features.” Llama 4 Maverick · Comms archiving · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Archive360 if you want a solution centered on consistent policy enforcement across email, chat, and meetings.” Perplexity Sonar · Comms archiving · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Best if you need strong Teams-centric compliance with broader supervision: Archive360 or Theta Lake” GPT-5.4 mini · Comms archiving · direct prompt · alternative
“consider Archive360 or Arctera for wider governance or platform consolidation” GPT-6 Luna · Comms archiving · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“While generally well-regarded, there are watch-outs: Configuration overhead” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Comms archiving · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Archive360, over the 32 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Archive360 was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Smarsh Enterprise Archive27 of 3211Not among the top eight
Global Relay22 of 326Not among the top eight
Proofpoint Enterprise Archive21 of 328Not among the top eight
Microsoft Purview16 of 323Not among the top eight
Mimecast Cloud Archive16 of 321Not among the top eight
Google Vault9 of 324Not among the top eight
Jatheon9 of 320Not among the top eight
Theta Lake9 of 320Not among the top eight
Arctera8 of 321Not among the top eight
Veritas Enterprise Vault5 of 320Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Archive360. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 31 of the 32 answers that named Archive360 and are not a share of its labels.

Search and answers

archive360.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Archive360 takes 2% of first choices and Smarsh Enterprise Archive takes 20%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “communications archiving platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “communications archiving platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
320 a month (“archive360”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
0 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 843 a month
Searches its site ranks for
276 · 17 in the top three
Sites linking to it
991
Paid Google search
1 searches its ads show for, about 5 clicks and $268 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
26 ads · 24 image, 2 text · 1 shown in the last 30 days

First shown April 2024, as ARCHIVE360, LLC, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 25 in the year, 1 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
2%
rank 12 of 101 in comms archiving
Segment leader
20%
Smarsh Enterprise Archive
First choices
2 across its categories
Named in
32 answers
Its own site cited
in 31 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on archive360.com
461
subdomains included
Content
349
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog12722026-09-30GRC, Data catalogs
Conference or event6852026-09-09
Podcast or video52undatedGRC
Webinar or virtual event4402026-06-01Data catalogs
Case study3902021-09-26
Report or ebook13undatedGRC
News or press4undated
Comparison1undated
Template or tool1undated

Most recent

Events in person

Upcoming
Last twelve months

As the event pages on archive360.com state them, read October 5, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page archive360.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as Archive360

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Archive360; a claim can dispute any of them.
Archive360 (Archive2Azure) 1

Follow Archive360

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Archive360 is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Enterprise Data and AI Governance Platform for regulated organizations
For
regulated organizations
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers

What Archive360's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: archive360.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Archive360's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Archive360, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Archive360 by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Archive360 is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Archive360, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at archive360.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.