Index › Products › Google Antigravity · October 2026 Edition

Google Cloud · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Google Antigravity

3Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

2 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Google Antigravity was named 3 times in AI coding, where GitHub Copilot led with 75%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market31 of 48

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In ai coding · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Google Antigravity for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
AI coding assistants	Developer platform	0%	31 of 48	33%	3	under 10 labels · led by GitHub Copilot at 75%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Google Antigravity yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Google Antigravity across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	1	0	1	2
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“look at Antigravity or Devin Desktop if coordinating agents is central to your workflow” GPT-6 Luna · AI coding · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“A July 2026 security report found a symlink-related flaw pattern across these six tools” GPT-6 Luna · AI coding · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Google Antigravity, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Google Antigravity was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Claude Code3 of 31Not among the top eight

Cursor3 of 31Not among the top eight

GitHub Copilot3 of 31Not among the top eight

Windsurf3 of 30Not among the top eight

Amazon Q Developer2 of 30Not among the top eight

Devin2 of 30Not among the top eight

OpenAI Codex2 of 30Not among the top eight

AWS Kiro1 of 30Not among the top eight

Augment Code1 of 30Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Google Antigravity. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 3 answers that named Google Antigravity and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

claude.com2

prod.cursor.com2

academy.claude.com1

antigravity.google1

bsi.bund.de1

builder.io1

code.claude.com1

codegen.com1

cursordocs.com1

dev.to1

Twelve of the twelve domain citations in answers naming Google Antigravity came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

claude.com/product/claude-code2

academy.claude.com/courses/claude-code-101/what-is-claude-code1

antigravity.google/docs/ide/overview1

bsi.bund.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/EN/BSI/KI/ANSSI_BSI_AI_Coding_Assistants.pdf1

builder.io/blog/best-ai-coding-tools-20251

builder.io/blog/cursor-vs-windsurf-vs-github-copilot1

code.claude.com/docs/en1

codegen.com/ai-tools/cursor1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Google Antigravity

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Google Antigravity; a claim can dispute any of them.

Google Antigravity 2.0 1

Follow Google Antigravity

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Google Cloud is the company behind Google Antigravity.

ShowHide

On record

Company records

Also from Google Cloud: Google 2-Step Verification, Google Alerts, Google AlloyDB for PostgreSQL, Google Analytics, Google Artifact Registry, Google AutoML, Google BigQuery ML, Google BigQuery Omni and 84 more

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Google Antigravity's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Google Antigravity, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Google Antigravity by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Google Antigravity is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Google Antigravity, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.