Every category where a model named Lacework FortiCNAPP for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Cloud security posture management	Cloud and infrastructure	0%	39 of 53	36%	14	criticized challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Lacework FortiCNAPP yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Lacework FortiCNAPP across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1	1	3
Mistral Small	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	2	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	2	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative13 labelsNone

Budget-constrained4 labelsNone

Scale-constrained5 labelsNone

Negative11 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative36 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“good for anomaly detection and cloud workload visibility, though fit depends on your exact environment” GPT-5.4 mini · CSPM · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Lacework - Known for competitive pricing, especially for smaller deployments” Claude Haiku 4.5 · CSPM · budget prompt · alternative

“Real‑time infrastructure monitoring + inventory + compliance | Lacework” GLM 4.7 FlashX · CSPM · comparative prompt · alternative

“Known for inventory management and compliance” Mistral Small · CSPM · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Prisma Cloud and Lacework present the most documented risks around cost unpredictability and complexity” Kimi K2 · CSPM · negative prompt · hard negative

“Lacework / FortiCNAPP — Integration chaos, poor documentation, glitchy pipelines, forced migration.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · CSPM · negative prompt · hard negative

“What to avoid at low budget ... overkill for a company on a limited budget” DeepSeek V4 Flash · CSPM · budget prompt · hard negative

“noisy alerts, steep learning curves, and slower remediation... still lags leaders in agentless simplicity” Grok 4.1 Fast · CSPM · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Lacework FortiCNAPP, over the 36 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Lacework FortiCNAPP was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Wiz36 of 3614Not in the top three

Prisma Cloud32 of 361Not in the top three

Microsoft Defender for Cloud30 of 364Not in the top three

Orca Security26 of 362Not in the top three

Prowler20 of 369Not in the top three

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security17 of 360Not in the top three

Tenable Cloud Security11 of 360Not in the top three

Google Security Command Center9 of 361Not in the top three

AWS Security Hub7 of 361Not in the top three

Check Point CloudGuard7 of 360Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Lacework FortiCNAPP. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 30 of the 36 answers that named Lacework FortiCNAPP and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cloudaware.com25

cyberpress.org22

gbhackers.com18

cybersecuritynews.com17

orca.security17

busistack.com16

complyjet.com16

techrepublic.com14

ituonline.com10

expertinsights.com9

164 of the 164 domain citations in answers naming Lacework FortiCNAPP came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cloudaware.com/blog/top-cloud-security-posture-management-vendors25

cyberpress.org/cspm-tools-by-business-size-221

gbhackers.com/best-cspm-compared18

busistack.com/best-cloud-security-posture-management-tools-202616

complyjet.com/blog/best-cspm-tools16

cybersecuritynews.com/best-cspm-tools16

orca.security/resources/blog/best-cspm-tools15

techrepublic.com/article/best-cspm-tools14

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Lacework FortiCNAPP

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Lacework FortiCNAPP; a claim can dispute any of them.

Lacework 7Lacework Polygraph Data Platform 2Lacework (now FortiCNAPP by Fortinet) 1Lacework (now FortiCNAPP) 1Lacework / FortiCNAPP (Fortinet) 1Lacework/Fortinet 1Microsoft/Lacework Polygraph Data Platform 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Lacework FortiCNAPP's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Lacework FortiCNAPP, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at lacework.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.