Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 12 → 10 of 36
1 category · Named, not rankedBugsink
13Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Bugsink was named 5 times in Error monitoring, where Sentry led with 76%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business9 of 36
0%7 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market13 of 42
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise16 of 48
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In error monitoring · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Bugsink for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Error and crash monitoring | Developer platform | 0% | 13 of 42 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Sentry at 76% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Bugsink held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Error monitoring · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 10 → 12 of 39
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 18 → 15 of 47
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Error monitoring | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 10 → 13 of 42 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Bugsink across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Bugsink across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained4 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative5 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Safer Alternatives to Consider - GlitchTip/Bugsink: Open-source, Sentry-compatible, self-hostable” Kimi K2 · Error monitoring · negative prompt · first choice
“open-source self-hosted alternatives like GlitchTip and Bugsink have become highly popular” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Error monitoring · comparative prompt · alternative
“If you must self-host but want a lightweight footprint, look at Bugsink or GlitchTip” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Error monitoring · negative prompt · alternative
“Bugsink is written in Python/Django and is even more lightweight than GlitchTip.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Error monitoring · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Bugsink, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Bugsink was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Bugsink, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Bugsink was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Bugsink. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 13 answers that named Bugsink and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
ones.com7
ssojet.com6
bugsink.comYour site5
dash0.com5
guideflow.com5
posthog.com5
raygun.com5
scoutapm.com5
cadence.withremote.ai4
dupple.com4
Forty-six of the fifty-one domain citations in answers naming Bugsink came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
bugsink.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Bugsink takes 0% of first choices and Sentry takes 76%.ShowHide
Search and answers
bugsink.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Bugsink takes 0% of first choices and Sentry takes 76%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “error monitoring tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “error monitoring tools”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 140 a month (“bugsink”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 1 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 403 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 134 · 11 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 677
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 13 of 42 in error monitoring
Segment leader
76%
Sentry
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 13 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 13 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on bugsink.com
120
subdomains included
Content
63
counted in the table below
Documentation
42
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 55 | undated | APM | ||
| Comparison | 8 | undated |
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page bugsink.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Bugsink
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Bugsink; a claim can dispute any of them.
GlitchTip/Bugsink 1
Follow Bugsink
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Bugsink is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Bugsink is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Self-hosted error tracking for developers. Full stacktraces, local variables, Sentry SDK compatibility, and predictable costs at scale.
- For
- developers
- Price stated
- Hosted Self-Hosted; 15K / Evaluation Free; 75K Events $16 /mo; 600K Events $50 /mo; 3M Events $158 /mo; Self-hosted Free; Premium Support $15 /user/mo; Enterprise Support Custom bugsink.com
- Starting price
- Free bugsink.com
- Free plan or trial
- 15K / Evaluation Free bugsink.com
- Hosting
- EU (managed)Your serversEU
- Customers named
- Novion Energy SolutionsSimplectoDivi MediaRODUQ
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, certifications
What Bugsink's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: bugsink.com, bugsink.com/security. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Bugsink's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Bugsink, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Bugsink by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Bugsink is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Bugsink, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.