IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › Bugsink · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Bugsink

11Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

5 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Bugsink was named 5 times in Error monitoring, where Sentry led with 82%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business12 of 37

under the label threshold

Mid-market10 of 44

under the label threshold

Enterprise20 of 45

under the label threshold

In error monitoring · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Bugsink for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Error and crash monitoring	Developer platform	0%	10 of 44	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by Sentry at 82%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Bugsink yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Bugsink across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative6 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Bugsink is an ultra-lightweight, Python-based self-hosted error tracker.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Error monitoring · budget prompt · alternative

“Bugsink | Self-hosted, deliberately minimal, data stays with you” Kimi K2 · Error monitoring · negative prompt · alternative

“Bugsink (for self-hosted options)” Mistral Small · Error monitoring · negative prompt · alternative

“Go with Glitchtip or Bugsink” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Error monitoring · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Bugsink, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Bugsink was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Sentry11 of 115Not in the top three

GlitchTip11 of 112Not in the top three

Honeybadger10 of 111Not in the top three

Rollbar8 of 110Not in the top three

Bugsnag7 of 110Not in the top three

Datadog7 of 110Not in the top three

New Relic6 of 110Not in the top three

Better Stack3 of 110Not in the top three

Highlight.io3 of 110Not in the top three

PostHog3 of 110Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Bugsink. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 11 answers that named Bugsink and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cadence.withremote.ai6

scoutapm.com4

inventivehq.com3

rollbar.com3

apistatuscheck.com2

getlogwise.com2

guideflow.com2

observeone.com2

onpage.com2

radartrek.com2

Twenty-eight of the twenty-eight domain citations in answers naming Bugsink came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cadence.withremote.ai/blog/best-error-tracking-tools5

scoutapm.com/blog/best-error-monitoring-tools4

inventivehq.com/blog/best-error-tracking-tools-sentry-alternatives3

rollbar.com/blog/best-error-monitoring-tools3

apistatuscheck.com/blog/best-error-tracking-tools-20262

getlogwise.com/blog/best-error-monitoring-tools-20252

guideflow.com/blog/error-monitoring-software2

observeone.com/best/error-monitoring-tools2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Bugsink's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Bugsink, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at bugsink.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.