Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 9 → 23 of 68
2 categories · Named, not rankedFly.io
13Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Fly.io was named 4 times in Managed Kubernetes and 1 other category, where Google Kubernetes Engine led with 43%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business26 of 76
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market22 of 52
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In managed kubernetes · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Fly.io for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Managed Kubernetes platforms | Cloud and infrastructure | 0% | 22 of 52 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Google Kubernetes Engine at 43% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Managed relational databases | Data platform | 0% | 33 of 82 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Amazon RDS at 45% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Fly.io held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Managed Kubernetes · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 32 → 17 of 46
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Managed Kubernetes | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 32 → 22 of 52 |
| Managed databases | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 33 of 82, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Fly.io across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Fly.io across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“PaaS options like Heroku, Render, and Fly.io abstract away infrastructure concerns entirely” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Managed Kubernetes · negative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Fly.io, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Fly.io was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Fly.io, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Fly.io was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Fly.io. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 13 answers that named Fly.io and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
digitalocean.com6
it-ai-index.com5
northflank.com5
g2.com4
spot.rackspace.com4
blog.railway.com3
cloudinsight.cc3
medium.com3
aws.amazon.com2
checkthat.ai2
Thirty-seven of the thirty-seven domain citations in answers naming Fly.io came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
fly.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Fly.io takes 0% of first choices and Google Kubernetes Engine takes 43%.ShowHide
Search and answers
fly.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Fly.io takes 0% of first choices and Google Kubernetes Engine takes 43%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “managed kubernetes platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “managed kubernetes platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 2,900 a month (“fly.io”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 207 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 18,149 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 20,165 · 199 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 9,312
- Paid Google search
- 3 searches its ads show for, about 13 clicks and $251 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 22 of 52 in managed kubernetes
Segment leader
43%
Google Kubernetes Engine
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 13 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 10 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on fly.io
10,004
subdomains included
Content
372
counted in the table below
Documentation
9,164
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 199 | 2 | 2026-09-03 | CDN, Object storage | |
| Comparison | 60 | 11 | 2026-09-17 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 42 | 7 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Case study | 30 | 1 | 2026-08-04 | Object storage | |
| Report or ebook | 24 | 0 | 2025-03-13 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 8 | 1 | 2026-09-04 | ||
| News or press | 5 | 1 | 2026-07-24 | ||
| Template or tool | 3 | 0 | 2025-08-22 | ||
| Conference or event | 1 | 0 | 2022-08-08 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Laravel hosting glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-28Python hosting glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-28Docker hosting glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-28Django hosting glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-17Ephemeral vs persistent sandbox comparison
- 2026-09-14Fly vs railway comparison
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page fly.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Fly.io
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Fly.io; a claim can dispute any of them.
Railway/Render/Fly.io 1
Follow Fly.io
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Fly.io is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Fly.io is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- A global public cloud for running full-stack and AI applications.
- For
- AI agents; teams building on Fly.io
- Price stated
- Start for free, pay as you grow. fly.io/pricing
- Starting price
- Start for free fly.io/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Start for Free fly.io
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type IISOC 2 Type 2ISO 27001
- Hosting
- 18+ Regions worldwideSecaucusAshburnTorontoSan JoseLos AngelesDallasChicago
- Customers named
- SupabaseReplicateBuilder.ioFirecrawlKilocodeHatchetTailscaleTigris
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations
What Fly.io's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: fly.io, fly.io/pricing, fly.io/security, fly.io/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Fly.io's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Fly.io, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Fly.io by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Fly.io is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Fly.io, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.