IT AI Index
Index Vendors › DigitalOcean Kubernetes · September 2026 Edition
DigitalOcean · 1 category · Ranked

DigitalOcean Kubernetes

113Judge labels
33First choices
18Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
39% in Managed Kubernetes for small business buyers
Rank 2 of 48 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
3 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 12% of its 42 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentA small-business product: leader at small business, not named at enterprise.
In managed kubernetes · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named DigitalOcean Kubernetes for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Managed Kubernetes platformsCloud and infrastructure22%2 of 4812%42accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for DigitalOcean Kubernetes yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated DigitalOcean Kubernetes across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.513004
GPT-5.4 mini00112
Gemini 3.5 Flash11024
Perplexity Sonar12003
Grok 4.1 Fast22015
Mistral Small14005
DeepSeek V4 Flash12014
Llama 4 Maverick01102
Qwen 3.7 Flash11002
Kimi K211204
GLM 4.7 FlashX12003
MiniMax M2.512104

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct21 labels8
Paraphrase19 labels7
Comparative21 labels12not counted in share
Budget-constrained21 labels17
Scale-constrained8 labels1
Negative23 labels5not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative113 labels in all, every segment counted; 33 of the 50 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best Overall for Limited Budgets: DigitalOcean DOKS or Linode LKE tend to offer the best value for smaller deployments” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Managed Kubernetes · budget prompt · first choice
“Best all‑around budget choice: DigitalOcean DOKS – free control plane, per‑second billing, generous bandwidth” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Managed Kubernetes · budget prompt · first choice
“Start with DigitalOcean (DOKS) or Civo - both offer free control planes and simple, predictable pricing” Kimi K2 · Managed Kubernetes · budget prompt · first choice
“DigitalOcean Kubernetes (DOKS) is the best managed Kubernetes platform for a company with a limited budget.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Managed Kubernetes · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid if: Production needing 99.99%+ uptime or fast support.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Managed Kubernetes · negative prompt · hard negative
“DigitalOcean lacks the deep enterprise compliance tooling, advanced VPC security controls, and global regional footprint” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Managed Kubernetes · direct prompt · soft negative
“DigitalOcean lacks the deeply granular enterprise security controls ... that Fortune 500 B2B buyers often demand.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Managed Kubernetes · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“usually less ideal for a mid-sized B2B company with more serious platform requirements.” GPT-5.4 mini · Managed Kubernetes · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as DigitalOcean Kubernetes, over the 113 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and DigitalOcean Kubernetes was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Azure Kubernetes Service94 of 11311Not in the top three
Amazon EKS90 of 1137Not in the top three
Linode Kubernetes Engine58 of 1132Not in the top three
Civo51 of 1135Compare →
Red Hat OpenShift30 of 1132Not in the top three
Vultr Kubernetes Engine27 of 1130Not in the top three
Rancher26 of 1131Not in the top three
Scaleway Kapsule25 of 1130Not in the top three
Render15 of 1131Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named DigitalOcean Kubernetes. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 90 of the 113 answers that named DigitalOcean Kubernetes and are not a share of its labels.

Names read as DigitalOcean Kubernetes

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as DigitalOcean Kubernetes; a claim can dispute any of them.
DigitalOcean Kubernetes (DOKS) 19DigitalOcean 6DigitalOcean DOKS 2DigitalOcean (DOKS) 1DigitalOcean – Managed Kubernetes (DOKS) 1DigitalOcean's managed Kubernetes (DOKS) 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when DigitalOcean Kubernetes's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as DigitalOcean Kubernetes, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at digitalocean.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack