IT AI Index
Index Vendors › Google Kubernetes Engine · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Google Kubernetes Engine

184Judge labels
51First choices
30Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
39% in Managed Kubernetes for mid-market buyers
Rank 1 of 48 in the mid-market standingendorsed leader
5 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 11% of its 63 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
In managed kubernetes · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Google Kubernetes Engine for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Managed Kubernetes platformsCloud and infrastructure39%1 of 4811%63endorsed leader

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Google Kubernetes Engine yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Google Kubernetes Engine across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.511305
GPT-5.4 mini21205
Gemini 3.5 Flash51017
Perplexity Sonar21014
Grok 4.1 Fast13026
Mistral Small12104
DeepSeek V4 Flash41117
Llama 4 Maverick00202
Qwen 3.7 Flash51006
Kimi K250106
GLM 4.7 FlashX12126
MiniMax M2.531105

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct32 labels18
Paraphrase30 labels15
Comparative34 labels15not counted in share
Budget-constrained26 labels6
Scale-constrained29 labels12
Negative33 labels7not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative184 labels in all, every segment counted; 51 of the 73 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Strengths: Most automated features, fastest Kubernetes version support... Most automated upgrade process and strongest enterprise features” MiniMax M2.5 · Managed Kubernetes · comparative prompt · first choice
“the strongest default choice is usually Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) if you want the best overall managed Kubernetes experience” Perplexity Sonar · Managed Kubernetes · direct prompt · first choice
“Often considered the gold standard for managed Kubernetes... Choose GKE if you want the lowest day-to-day management overhead.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Managed Kubernetes · comparative prompt · first choice
“Best Overall for Lean Teams: Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) Autopilot ... is the gold standard for mid-market B2B companies.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Managed Kubernetes · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“avoid hyperscaler-only solutions like EKS, GKE, or AKS unless you have strong ecosystem reasons” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Managed Kubernetes · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid EKS/AKS/GKE if you need multi-cloud portability” Perplexity Sonar · Managed Kubernetes · negative prompt · hard negative
“avoid AWS EKS and GKE Standard on a tight budget” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Managed Kubernetes · budget prompt · hard negative
“AWS EKS, GKE Standard, and Azure AKS Standard all charge ≈ $0.10/hour (~$73/month) just for the control plane” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Managed Kubernetes · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Google Kubernetes Engine, over the 180 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Google Kubernetes Engine was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Amazon EKS169 of 1808Not in the top three
Azure Kubernetes Service167 of 1806Not in the top three
Red Hat OpenShift76 of 1808Not in the top three
Rancher57 of 1801Not in the top three
Linode Kubernetes Engine54 of 18011Not in the top three
Civo42 of 1809Compare →
VMware Tanzu31 of 1801Not in the top three
Vultr Kubernetes Engine23 of 1800Not in the top three
Scaleway Kapsule19 of 1801Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Google Kubernetes Engine. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 142 of the 180 answers that named Google Kubernetes Engine and are not a share of its labels.

Names read as Google Kubernetes Engine

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Google Kubernetes Engine; a claim can dispute any of them.
Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) 24Google GKE 16GKE 14GKE Autopilot 2GKE (Standard) 1GKE Standard 1Google Cloud GKE (Google Kubernetes Engine) 1Google GKE (Kubernetes Engine) 1Google GKE Autopilot 1Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) Autopilot 1Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) with Autopilot 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Google Kubernetes Engine's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Google Kubernetes Engine, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at google.dev is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack