| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Managed Kubernetes platforms | Cloud and infrastructure | 43% | 1 of 52 | 15% | 75 | endorsed leader | ▲+3Since September 2026: 39% → 42%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Managed Kubernetes | 39% | 42% | ▲+3Since September 2026: 39% → 42%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 1 of 52, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Grok 4.20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Kimi K2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“choose GKE Autopilot if you are building greenfield or starting fresh—its operational simplicity is like having an extra full-time DevOps engineer” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Managed Kubernetes · direct prompt · first choice
“Offers the most polished managed Kubernetes experience from any hyperscaler, with Autopilot mode that removes node management entirely” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Managed Kubernetes · comparative prompt · first choice
“most organizations are best served by GKE (Google) or AKS (Azure) \u2014 generally considered the most mature managed offerings” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Managed Kubernetes · negative prompt · first choice
“It is widely considered the most stable and reliable option among the "Big Three," with high availability built-in from day one.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Managed Kubernetes · comparative prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid EKS / AKS / GKE if you need low operational overhead on a tight budget or want maximum portability.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Managed Kubernetes · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid for tight budgets: Big 3 (GKE/AKS/EKS) due to control plane fees” Grok 4.20 · Managed Kubernetes · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid the big three (AWS EKS, GCP GKE Standard, Azure AKS standard)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Managed Kubernetes · budget prompt · hard negative
“Managed services like GKE Autopilot and EKS Fargate come with tradeoffs: less control over node configuration, higher per-pod costs, and vendor lock-in.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Managed Kubernetes · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 194 of the 208 answers that named Google Kubernetes Engine and are not a share of its labels.
653 of the 653 domain citations in answers naming Google Kubernetes Engine came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 37 | 14 | 2026-09-28 | API management | |
| Case study | 19 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 4 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 2 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 2 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated | |||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
Every page cloud.google.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Google Kubernetes Engine's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: cloud.google.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Google Kubernetes Engine's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Google Kubernetes Engine, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Google Kubernetes Engine by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
AI models recommend Google Kubernetes Engine first in Managed Kubernetes platforms this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.