| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Managed relational databases | Data platform | 4% | 8 of 73 | 11% | 9 | under 10 labels · led by Amazon RDS at 32% |
| Managed Kubernetes platforms | Cloud and infrastructure | 0% | 21 of 48 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Google Kubernetes Engine at 39% |
| Cloud hosting | Cloud and infrastructure | 0% | 29 of 78 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Amazon Web Services at 29% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“For the lowest cost, Neon or Railway Postgres are the best choices.” Mistral Small · Managed databases · budget prompt · first choice
“1. Railway Postgres: starts at ~$5/month (usage-based)” Llama 4 Maverick · Managed databases · budget prompt · first choice
“These are Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS) providers built for modern development teams.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Cloud hosting · budget prompt · alternative
“Railway - Best for small to mid-size teams who want Kubernetes without an AWS bill.” Llama 4 Maverick · Managed Kubernetes · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Why avoid: Marketed as usage-based, but it's actually a container service, not a true managed database.” Mistral Small · Managed databases · negative prompt · hard negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 20 of the 34 answers that named Railway and are not a share of its labels.
Sixty of the sixty-six domain citations in answers naming Railway came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Railway's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Railway, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at railway.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.