IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › Fidelis Halo Cloud Secure · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Fidelis Halo Cloud Secure

5Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

3 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Fidelis Halo Cloud Secure was named 1 time in CNAPP, where Wiz led with 46%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business23 of 67

under the label threshold

Mid-market29 of 57

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In cnapp · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Fidelis Halo Cloud Secure for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Cloud-native application protection	Cloud and infrastructure	0%	29 of 57	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Wiz at 46%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Fidelis Halo Cloud Secure yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Fidelis Halo Cloud Secure across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained5 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Halo Cloud Secure (Best Truly Free Option – Up to 10 Accounts)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · CNAPP · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Fidelis Halo Cloud Secure, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Fidelis Halo Cloud Secure was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Microsoft Defender for Cloud5 of 54Not in the top three

Prowler4 of 51Not in the top three

Falco3 of 50Not in the top three

Wiz3 of 50Not in the top three

Aikido Security2 of 51Not in the top three

Cloudanix2 of 50Not in the top three

Orca Security2 of 50Not in the top three

Prisma Cloud2 of 50Not in the top three

Trivy2 of 50Not in the top three

AWS Security Hub1 of 50Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Fidelis Halo Cloud Secure. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 5 answers that named Fidelis Halo Cloud Secure and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cyberpress.org5

gbhackers.com5

sourceforge.net5

aikido.dev4

busistack.com3

cybersecuritynews.com3

microsoft.com3

wiz.io3

aws.amazon.com2

azure.microsoft.com2

Thirty-five of the thirty-five domain citations in answers naming Fidelis Halo Cloud Secure came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cyberpress.org/cnapp-platforms-by-business-size-24

aikido.dev/blog/top-cloud-native-application-protection-platforms-cnapp3

busistack.com/best-cloud-security-posture-management-tools-20263

gbhackers.com/best-cnapp-compared3

microsoft.com/en-us/security/business/cloud-security/microsoft-defender-cloud3

sourceforge.net/software/cloud-native-application-protection-platforms-cnapp3

sourceforge.net/software/cloud-native-application-protection-platforms-cnapp/for-small-bus3

azure.microsoft.com/en-us/pricing/details/defender-for-cloud2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Fidelis Halo Cloud Secure

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Fidelis Halo Cloud Secure; a claim can dispute any of them.

Halo Cloud Secure 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Fidelis Halo Cloud Secure's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Fidelis Halo Cloud Secure, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at fidelis.co is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.