AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Enpass · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Enpass

5Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Enpass was named 2 times in Password managers, where 1Password led with 47%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In password managers · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Enpass for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Business password managersIdentity and access0%19 of 3550%2under 10 labels · led by 1Password at 47%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Enpass held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Password managers · by segment

Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 14 → 19 of 35
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 12 → 11 of 37

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Password managers0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 14 → 19 of 35

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Enpass across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2000000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500011
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“A security flaw was discovered affecting 11 password managers” MiniMax M2.5 · Password managers · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Enpass, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Enpass was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Bitwarden5 of 52Not among the top eight
1Password4 of 52Not among the top eight
Dashlane4 of 51Not among the top eight
LastPass4 of 50Not among the top eight
Keeper Security3 of 51Not among the top eight
NordPass2 of 50Not among the top eight
LogMeOnce1 of 50Not among the top eight
ManageEngine Password Manager Pro1 of 50Not among the top eight
Norton Password Manager1 of 50Not among the top eight
Passwordstate1 of 50Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Enpass. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 5 answers that named Enpass and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

bitwarden.com4
passwork.pro4
dashlane.com3
enpass.ioYour site3
lastpass.com3
1password.com2
blog.lastpass.com2
securden.com2
techrepublic.com2
academia.edu1

Twenty-three of the twenty-six domain citations in answers naming Enpass came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on enpass.io
518
subdomains included
Content
64
counted in the table below
Documentation
448
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog4332026-08-13MFA
News or press1212026-09-16SIEM
Comparison602023-01-31
Report or ebook2undated
Glossary or explainer112026-07-23
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page enpass.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Enpass

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Enpass is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Secure Passkey & Password Manager That Keeps Your Data On Your Cloud Storage
For
Businesses and users who want privacy and security
Price stated
Free Plan $0 forever; Premium Plan $1.99/month; Family Plan $3.99/month; Business Plan $1.99/user/month billed yearly enpass.io
Starting price
0 enpass.io
Free plan or trial
Free Plan; Start your FREE trial; You can try Enpass for free. You don't need a credit card. enpass.io
Certifications
ISO 27001:2022SOC 2 Type II AuditedGDPR CompliantISO 27001SOC 2ISO 27701GDPRTISAX
Hosting
IrelandAustraliaIndiaUnited States of America
Customers named
Global Consulting FirmLeading Healthcare FirmEuropean Car Manufacturer
Not stated on the pages read
Integrations

What Enpass's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: enpass.io, trust.enpass.io. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Enpass's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Enpass, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Enpass by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Enpass is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Enpass, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at enpass.io is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.