IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › Enate · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Enate

16Judge labels

6First choices

2Negative labels

8 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Enate was named 4 times in Orchestration, where Prefect led with 24%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business9 of 78

under the label threshold

Mid-market7 of 86

under the label threshold

Enterprise7 of 89

under the label threshold

In orchestration · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Enate for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Workflow orchestration	Data platform	4%	7 of 86	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Prefect at 24%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Enate yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Enate across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct14 labels6

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative16 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Top Pick: Enate ... Specifically built for B2B service operations.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Orchestration · direct prompt · first choice

“Enate or Next Matter are likely the best fits” Mistral Small · Orchestration · direct prompt · first choice

“Enate or Next Matter are specifically recommended for B2B service operations” Perplexity Sonar · Orchestration · direct prompt · alternative

“Other options include Enate, SnapLogic, and Elementum.” Llama 4 Maverick · Orchestration · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Enate, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Enate was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Next Matter10 of 160Not in the top three

Zapier7 of 163Not in the top three

Workato6 of 162Not in the top three

Make4 of 162Not in the top three

n8n4 of 160Not in the top three

Apache Airflow3 of 160Not in the top three

ServiceNow3 of 160Not in the top three

SnapLogic3 of 160Not in the top three

Camunda2 of 161Not in the top three

HubSpot Marketing Hub2 of 161Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Enate. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 16 answers that named Enate and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

enate.ioYour site16

elementum.ai15

zapier.com12

wrike.com11

coredna.com10

teamwork.com8

nected.ai6

thedigitalprojectmanager.com5

devopsschool.com4

snaplogic.com4

Seventy-five of the ninety-one domain citations in answers naming Enate came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

elementum.ai/blog/best-workflow-orchestration-tools15

enate.io/blog/workflow-orchestration-tools15

zapier.com/blog/workflow-orchestration-tools12

wrike.com/workflow-guide/workflow-orchestration-tools11

coredna.com/blogs/6-best-orchestration-platforms-for-b2b-and-b2c-workflows10

teamwork.com/blog/workflow-orchestration-tools8

nected.ai/blog/top-workflow-orchestration-tools-in-20266

devopsschool.com/blog/top-10-workflow-orchestration-tools-features-pros-cons-comparison4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Enate's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Enate, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at enate.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.