IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › Next Matter · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Next Matter

10Judge labels

5First choices

0Negative labels

6 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Next Matter was named 3 times in Orchestration, where Prefect led with 24%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business11 of 78

under the label threshold

Mid-market11 of 86

under the label threshold

Enterprise6 of 89

under the label threshold

In orchestration · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Next Matter for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Workflow orchestration	Data platform	2%	11 of 86	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Prefect at 24%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Next Matter yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Next Matter across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct9 labels5

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Enate or Next Matter are likely the best fits” Mistral Small · Orchestration · direct prompt · first choice

“Enate or Next Matter are specifically recommended for B2B service operations” Perplexity Sonar · Orchestration · direct prompt · alternative

“Alternative: Next Matter” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Orchestration · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Next Matter, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Next Matter was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Enate10 of 101Not in the top three

Workato5 of 103Not in the top three

ServiceNow3 of 100Not in the top three

Zapier3 of 100Not in the top three

Make2 of 101Not in the top three

Apache Airflow2 of 100Not in the top three

Appian2 of 100Not in the top three

HubSpot2 of 100Not in the top three

Pega2 of 100Not in the top three

SnapLogic2 of 100Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Next Matter. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 10 answers that named Next Matter and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

elementum.ai10

enate.io10

zapier.com8

coredna.com6

wrike.com6

nected.ai5

teamwork.com4

thedigitalprojectmanager.com4

cognism.com3

larksuite.com3

Fifty-nine of the fifty-nine domain citations in answers naming Next Matter came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

elementum.ai/blog/best-workflow-orchestration-tools10

enate.io/blog/workflow-orchestration-tools10

zapier.com/blog/workflow-orchestration-tools8

coredna.com/blogs/6-best-orchestration-platforms-for-b2b-and-b2c-workflows6

wrike.com/workflow-guide/workflow-orchestration-tools6

nected.ai/blog/top-workflow-orchestration-tools-in-20265

teamwork.com/blog/workflow-orchestration-tools4

thedigitalprojectmanager.com/tools/workflow-orchestration-tools4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Next Matter's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Next Matter, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at nextmatter.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.