Every category where a model named CrowdStrike Falcon Surface for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Attack surface management	Security operations	0%	27 of 104	22%	9	under 10 labels · led by Intruder at 59%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for CrowdStrike Falcon Surface yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated CrowdStrike Falcon Surface across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	2	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	2	1	0	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase6 labels2

Comparative12 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained4 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative6 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative33 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you already use CrowdStrike, it integrates into the Falcon platform | Best as a module, not standalone” DeepSeek V4 Flash · ASM · scale prompt · alternative

“Best for: CrowdStrike shops wanting ASM inside their existing security stack.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · ASM · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“are overkill: $50k+ annually, complex sales cycles, better for 1,000+ employee firms” Grok 4.1 Fast · ASM · paraphrase prompt · hard negative

“powerful but often overkill/too pricey ($50K+), better for larger firms” Grok 4.1 Fast · ASM · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as CrowdStrike Falcon Surface, over the 33 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CrowdStrike Falcon Surface was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management26 of 334Not in the top three

Cortex Xpanse26 of 330Not in the top three

CyCognito25 of 335Not in the top three

Censys ASM17 of 331Not in the top three

Detectify12 of 333Not in the top three

Tenable Attack Surface Management12 of 330Not in the top three

Synack11 of 332Not in the top three

Intruder9 of 338Not in the top three

Bitsight8 of 333Not in the top three

IONIX8 of 331Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CrowdStrike Falcon Surface. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 31 of the 33 answers that named CrowdStrike Falcon Surface and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

upguard.com24

synack.com22

bitsight.com17

guideflow.com16

guptadeepak.com16

wiz.io16

gartner.com15

paloaltonetworks.com15

cycognito.com12

g2.com11

164 of the 164 domain citations in answers naming CrowdStrike Falcon Surface came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

upguard.com/blog/best-attack-surface-management-software-solutions24

synack.com/blog/best-attack-surface-management-tools22

bitsight.com/guides/best-external-attack-surface-management-platforms-for-global-enterpris17

guideflow.com/blog/attack-surface-management-software16

guptadeepak.com/tools/top-10-attack-surface-management-tools-202616

paloaltonetworks.com/cyberpedia/asm-tools-comparison15

wiz.io/academy/cloud-security/attack-surface-management-tools13

gartner.com/reviews/market/external-attack-surface-management12

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as CrowdStrike Falcon Surface

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as CrowdStrike Falcon Surface; a claim can dispute any of them.

Falcon Surface 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CrowdStrike Falcon Surface's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CrowdStrike Falcon Surface, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at crowdstrike.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.