Every category where a model named Mandiant Attack Surface Management for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Attack surface management	Security operations	0%	19 of 104	20%	10	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Mandiant Attack Surface Management yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Mandiant Attack Surface Management across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	0	1
Mistral Small	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative9 labelsNone

Budget-constrained4 labels2

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative4 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative21 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Leads in threat intelligence integration, helping prioritize risks based on real-world attacker behavior.” Mistral Small · ASM · comparative prompt · alternative

“Deep threat intelligence integration and Mandiant's research pedigree.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · ASM · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best for: Organizations wanting threat-intelligence-led ASM” MiniMax M2.5 · ASM · comparative prompt · alternative

“Threat intelligence-led.” Grok 4.1 Fast · ASM · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“folded into massive enterprise security suites (like Microsoft Defender, Google Cloud Security, or Check Point Infinity)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ASM · negative prompt · soft negative

“Vendors like BitSight or Mandiant may have pricing models ($10k-$100k+ annually) that are overkill” Qwen 3.7 Flash · ASM · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Mandiant Attack Surface Management, over the 21 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Mandiant Attack Surface Management was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

CyCognito16 of 213Not in the top three

Cortex Xpanse16 of 211Not in the top three

Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management13 of 212Not in the top three

Censys ASM12 of 210Not in the top three

Detectify8 of 210Not in the top three

Synack7 of 211Not in the top three

CrowdStrike Falcon Surface7 of 210Not in the top three

IBM Randori7 of 210Not in the top three

Bitsight5 of 211Not in the top three

IONIX5 of 210Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Mandiant Attack Surface Management. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 18 of the 21 answers that named Mandiant Attack Surface Management and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

upguard.com15

synack.com12

bitsight.com8

cycognito.com8

gartner.com8

secpod.com8

wiz.io8

guptadeepak.com6

riskpublishing.com6

cloud.google.com5

Eighty-four of the eighty-four domain citations in answers naming Mandiant Attack Surface Management came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

upguard.com/blog/best-attack-surface-management-software-solutions15

synack.com/blog/best-attack-surface-management-tools12

bitsight.com/guides/best-external-attack-surface-management-platforms-for-global-enterpris8

secpod.com/learn/expressions-and-povs/top-attack-surface-management-vendors-20247

wiz.io/academy/cloud-security/attack-surface-management-tools7

gartner.com/reviews/market/external-attack-surface-management6

guptadeepak.com/tools/top-10-attack-surface-management-tools-20266

riskpublishing.com/top-attack-surface-management-asm-tools-compa6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Mandiant Attack Surface Management

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Mandiant Attack Surface Management; a claim can dispute any of them.

Mandiant ASM (Google Cloud) 4Google Cloud Security by Mandiant 3Google Cloud Security 1Mandiant 1Mandiant ASM 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Mandiant Attack Surface Management's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Mandiant Attack Surface Management, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at mandiant.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.