Three of fourteen models named Credo AI first on the direct prompt; zero named Holistic AI. Credo AI was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Holistic AI by eleven and Credo AI carries 49 labels and Holistic AI 22, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the AI governance platforms page.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Credo AI and Holistic AI were named in the same answer seventy-two times, of the 153 answers naming Credo AI and the 79 naming Holistic AI. In those answers Holistic AI took the first choice zero times and Credo AI nineteen.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“What to Avoid (Too Expensive for Limited Budgets) ... Credo AI | $30,000-$150,000/year | Enterprise-only, quote-gated” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“What to avoid (if budget is tight) - Credo AI – starts at ~$50,000/year” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Some platforms, such as Credo AI, are strong in documentation and risk assessment but do not currently offer runtime enforcement for live AI traffic.” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“Excels in policy-to-code automation and compliance workflows... Best for enterprises building governance programs from scratch” Grok 4.1 Fast · comparative prompt · first choice
“The best overall AI governance platform, pairing an AI use-case registry with regulation-mapped assessments and a policy engine” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“A platform that wins on regulatory alignment (e.g., Credo AI) is not a replacement for deep production observability” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“What to avoid ... Holistic AI – starts around $40K/year for SMBs” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Holistic AI | Custom quotes | No self-serve pricing” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“typically custom / enterprise pricing, often $25K-$250K+/year, and "pricing structure is less accessible for small teams"” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · soft negative
“Start with a trial of Credo AI or Holistic AI if your priority is commercial compliance and customer trust.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Pairs technical risk libraries with regulator-aligned assessment workflows; good for enterprise risk quantification” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best For: Organizations focused on detailed model risk management and independent auditing.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.