IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › ComplyJet · September 2026 Edition

3 categories · Named, not ranked

ComplyJet

20Judge labels

4First choices

3Negative labels

7 of 12Models named it

3Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

6 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. ComplyJet was named 6 times in Compliance automation and 2 other categories, where Drata led with 37%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business28 of 60

under the label threshold

Mid-market21 of 54

under the label threshold

Enterprise53 of 54

under the label threshold

In compliance automation · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named ComplyJet for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Compliance automation	Security operations	0%	21 of 54	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Drata at 37%
GRC platforms	Security operations	0%	36 of 77	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Vanta at 14%
Third-party risk management	Security operations	0%	40 of 72	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by UpGuard at 53%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ComplyJet yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ComplyJet across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	2	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase6 labels2

Comparative4 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained8 labels2

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative20 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose ComplyJet if you need to build a full compliance program (SOC 2) alongside your vendor management.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · TPRM · budget prompt · alternative

“Strong Low-Cost Alternatives ... Flat pricing (no per-user fees), 350+ integrations, 4.8/5 G2 rating” Grok 4.1 Fast · Compliance automation · budget prompt · alternative

“Great for deep automation across 25+ frameworks and strong integration coverage” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Compliance automation · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“ComplyJet (~$4,000–5,000/year) is a strong choice” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Compliance automation · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ComplyJet, over the 20 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ComplyJet was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Vanta18 of 205Not in the top three

Drata14 of 202Not in the top three

Sprinto11 of 201Not in the top three

Secureframe8 of 200Not in the top three

Hyperproof7 of 201Not in the top three

UpGuard6 of 201Not in the top three

ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management5 of 200Not in the top three

Scrut Automation4 of 200Not in the top three

ThirdProof3 of 201Not in the top three

AuditBoard3 of 200Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ComplyJet. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 20 of the 20 answers that named ComplyJet and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

complyjet.comYour site19

orbiqhq.com9

sprinto.com9

upguard.com7

vanta.com7

learn.g2.com6

brightdefense.com5

g2.com5

guideflow.com5

auditxyz.com4

Fifty-seven of the seventy-six domain citations in answers naming ComplyJet came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

complyjet.com/blog/best-grc-software8

complyjet.com/blog/best-vendor-risk-management-software7

brightdefense.com/resources/grc-tools-for-smbs-and-startups5

complyjet.com/blog/best-compliance-management-software5

cofes.com/vendor-risk-management-software4

complyjet.com/blog/best-soc-2-compliance-software4

complyjet.com/pricing4

learn.g2.com/best-third-party-risk-management-software4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ComplyJet's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ComplyJet, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at complyjet.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.