AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Cloudflare Load Balancer · October 2026 Edition
Cloudflare · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Cloudflare Load Balancer

9Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Cloudflare Load Balancer was named 3 times in Load balancers, where HAProxy led with 29%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In load balancers · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Cloudflare Load Balancer for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Load balancersNetwork and edge2%12 of 940%3under 10 labels · led by HAProxy at 29%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Cloudflare Load Balancer yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Cloudflare Load Balancer across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500101
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small10001
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.501001
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labels1
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“HAProxy (free) or Cloudflare (low-cost with extra features) are the best choices” Mistral Small · Load balancers · budget prompt · first choice
“consider cloud-agnostic solutions (like HAProxy, F5 BIG-IP, or Cloudflare Load Balancer) to avoid vendor lock-in” MiniMax M2.5 · Load balancers · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Cloudflare Load Balancer, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Cloudflare Load Balancer was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
HAProxy9 of 92Not among the top eight
NGINX7 of 92Not among the top eight
Traefik6 of 92Not among the top eight
AWS Elastic Load Balancing5 of 93Not among the top eight
F5 BIG-IP4 of 90Not among the top eight
AWS ALB3 of 90Not among the top eight
Azure Load Balancer3 of 90Not among the top eight
Envoy3 of 90Not among the top eight
GCP Cloud Load Balancing2 of 91Not among the top eight
Google Cloud Load Balancing2 of 90Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Cloudflare Load Balancer. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 9 answers that named Cloudflare Load Balancer and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

xurrent.com5
loadbalancer.org4
aws.amazon.com3
guideflow.com3
kemptechnologies.com3
learn.g2.com3
pickmysoft.com3
cloudspress.com2
devopsschool.com2
gitnux.org2

Thirty of the thirty domain citations in answers naming Cloudflare Load Balancer came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow Cloudflare Load Balancer

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Cloudflare is the company behind Cloudflare Load Balancer.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Maximize application performance and availability
Price stated
Load Balancing starts at $5 per month, and includes 500,000 DNS queries each month blog.cloudflare.com/introducing-load-balancing-intelligent-failover-with-cloudflare
Free plan or trial
Enterprise customers can preview this product as a non-contract service, which provides full access, free of metered usage fees, limits, and certain other restrictions. developers.cloudflare.com/load-balancing
Hosting
Cloudflare's 110+ datacenters
Customers named
Crisp
Not stated on the pages read
Integrations, certifications

What Cloudflare Load Balancer's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: developers.cloudflare.com/load-balancing, blog.cloudflare.com/unimog-cloudflares-edge-load-balancer, blog.cloudflare.com/high-availability-load-balancers-with-maglev, blog.cloudflare.com/eliminating-hardware-with-load-balancing-and-cloudflare-one, blog.cloudflare.com/introducing-load-balancing-intelligent-failover-with-cloudflare. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Cloudflare Load Balancer's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Cloudflare Load Balancer, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Cloudflare Load Balancer by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Cloudflare Load Balancer is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Cloudflare Load Balancer, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at cloudflare.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.