AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › AWS ALB · October 2026 Edition
AWS · 1 category · Named, not ranked

AWS ALB

19Judge labels
0First choices
7Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
8 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. AWS ALB was named 8 times in Load balancers, where HAProxy led with 29%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In load balancers · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named AWS ALB for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Load balancersNetwork and edge0%38 of 9438%8under 10 labels · led by HAProxy at 29%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for AWS ALB yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated AWS ALB across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00011
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2001001
Mistral Small00112
DeepSeek V4 Flash01012
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained6 labelsNone
Scale-constrained5 labelsNone
Negative2 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative19 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Managed Cloud Services (e.g., AWS ALB, Azure Front Door): The "Path of Least Resistance." Zero management overhead, auto-scaling included.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Load balancers · scale prompt · alternative
“Cloud-heavy (AWS/Azure/GCP): Native cloud LBs—simple, scalable, no management overhead.” Grok 4.20 · Load balancers · direct prompt · alternative
“if cloud: AWS ALB, Azure LB, GCP” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Load balancers · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“If you are tempted to use major clouds like AWS or Google Cloud, be careful... they charge heavily for data egress (outbound bandwidth)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Load balancers · budget prompt · soft negative
“excellent within their ecosystems but can lead to vendor lock-in” Mistral Small · Load balancers · negative prompt · soft negative
“Scales automatically but can add up with traffic” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Load balancers · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as AWS ALB, over the 19 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and AWS ALB was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
HAProxy16 of 198Not among the top eight
NGINX16 of 195Not among the top eight
Azure Load Balancer8 of 190Not among the top eight
Citrix ADC7 of 190Not among the top eight
Traefik6 of 192Not among the top eight
F56 of 190Not among the top eight
GCP Cloud Load Balancing6 of 190Not among the top eight
Envoy5 of 190Not among the top eight
Cloudflare Load Balancing4 of 190Not among the top eight
DigitalOcean Load Balancers4 of 190Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named AWS ALB. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 19 answers that named AWS ALB and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

loadbalancer.org12
g2.com9
aws.amazon.comYour site8
guideflow.com8
kemptechnologies.com8
xurrent.com8
learn.g2.com6
pickmysoft.com6
devopsschool.com5
learn.microsoft.com5

Sixty-seven of the seventy-five domain citations in answers naming AWS ALB came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where AWS ALB stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Searches for its name, Google
1,300 a month (“aws alb”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
227 a month
Its own site
It sits on AWS's site (aws.amazon.com), so there are no site figures for it alone

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 38 of 94 in load balancers
Segment leader
29%
HAProxy
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
19 answers
Its own site cited
in 16 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow AWS ALB

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

AWS is the company behind AWS ALB.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
a popular AWS service that load balances incoming traffic at the application layer (layer 7) across multiple targets, such as Amazon EC2 instances, in a region
Hosting
a region
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, customers

What AWS ALB's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: aws.amazon.com/blogs/opensource/kubernetes-ingress-aws-alb-ingress-controller, aws.amazon.com/blogs/containers/app-mesh-integration-with-aws-alb-ingress-controller. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when AWS ALB's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as AWS ALB, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for AWS ALB by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where AWS ALB is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name AWS ALB, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at aws.amazon.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.